mrsleeve91's DOHC build thread

Real tech discussion. Not pansy-ass-bitch questions about the power a CAI will give.

Moderators: The Dark Side of Will, Series8217

Postby The Dark Side of Will » Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:55 am

Atilla the Fun wrote:Getrags have one other failure point. In the bellhousing area, that flat pad at about the 10:00 position. The bearing inside of there can push through.


I've seen that happen, but I think that's a casting defect related to the shape of the structure around that area.

The axial load from the final drive mesh actually pushes the output shaft the OTHER way, away from the part that breaks. The only way to apply load to that part of the case is to dump the clutch in reverse.
User avatar
The Dark Side of Will
Peer Mediator
 
Posts: 11309
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 11:13 pm
Location: In the darkness, where fear and knowing are one

Postby Atilla the Fun » Fri Oct 10, 2008 12:06 pm

Image
Atilla the Fun
 
Posts: 2360
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:36 pm

Postby Series8217 » Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:45 pm

Does the output shaft get pushed toward the input shaft or is that force balanced by the transfer of power to the diff gear?
User avatar
Series8217
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Postby mrsleeve91 » Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:40 pm

Humm I think I see a dog cut box as the next step.

I have seen what atilla fun is talking about, wouldn't that be more likely from downshifting instead of dumping the clutch in reverse? Just saying..

And now that you say that I remeber something from Jon and the indy project, how they ended up getting straight cut gears.
But wouldnt the 2nd gear cluster want to go out the otherside? Or are you saying that the bellhousing side of the case is just so waek that fails there before it can anywhere else?
The DSM trans is similar, and the only place they fail is between 1 and 2 clusters. Hence my bracing thought.
I've got 3 NOS getrags to experiment with, as I figured that and the axles are going to have a short life span.
mrsleeve91
 
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 7:54 pm
Location: Tucson, USA

Postby Series8217 » Sat Oct 11, 2008 1:59 am

mrsleeve91 wrote:Humm I think I see a dog cut box as the next step.

I have seen what atilla fun is talking about, wouldn't that be more likely from downshifting instead of dumping the clutch in reverse? Just saying..

And now that you say that I remeber something from Jon and the indy project, how they ended up getting straight cut gears.
But wouldnt the 2nd gear cluster want to go out the otherside? Or are you saying that the bellhousing side of the case is just so waek that fails there before it can anywhere else?
The DSM trans is similar, and the only place they fail is between 1 and 2 clusters. Hence my bracing thought.
I've got 3 NOS getrags to experiment with, as I figured that and the axles are going to have a short life span.


The diff gets pushed toward the bellhousing side due to the angle cut into the gears. That's why the reinforcement you made should be on the other side.
The failure inside the bellhousing area that is referenced in the pic above is a different point of failure... its uncommon and there doesn't seem to be a consensus on why it happens.
User avatar
Series8217
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Postby mrsleeve91 » Sat Oct 11, 2008 3:58 am

Yeah I get that, All im saying is that with every action (force) there is and equal and opposite reaction (force). So if there is enough force to push the diff out of the case on the bell housing side there has to be the same force pushing the 2nd gear cluster towards the drivers side. But cause the bell side is weaker than the drivers it comes out the bell side. Thats Ill I was trying to say.
Also i was thinking that brace cant hurt, so when I grenade this one, Ill figure out why, and fix it for the next one. And when that one fails Ill figure that one out and go from there. trial and error thats all you can do.
mrsleeve91
 
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 7:54 pm
Location: Tucson, USA

Postby fieromadman » Sat Oct 11, 2008 5:03 am

That build is the:

Image

Get some videos.

Whats you engine management?
95 3.4 DOHC- 96-97 p&p lower intake, custom upper intake, custom cams, ported exh manis, 180* t-stat.
T-62 Turbonetics T3/T4, air-liquid intercooled, Synapse 40mm, Greddy RS, Haltech E6K.
1987 GT, lowered, KYB's, clutchnet 6 puck, G/A brakes
User avatar
fieromadman
 
Posts: 484
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 11:26 pm
Location: oconomowoc WI

Postby The Dark Side of Will » Sat Oct 11, 2008 7:29 am

mrsleeve91 wrote:there has to be the same force pushing the 2nd gear cluster towards the drivers side. But cause the bell side is weaker than the drivers it comes out the bell side.


Say what? :scratch:

Series8217 wrote:Does the output shaft get pushed toward the input shaft or is that force balanced by the transfer of power to the diff gear?


The diff is pushed to the right. The input shaft is pushed to the left. The output has a force to the right from the input shaft and a force to the left from the diff. Only the NET of these two forces act on the output.

I don't have the center distance between the output shaft and diff handy, but if I did, I could do a BOTEC and figure out which way the output is pushed. Assuming an equal helix angle, I'd guess the output is pushed to the left, because the tooth loading on the final drive mesh is MUCH higher than the tooth loading on the shifted gears.
User avatar
The Dark Side of Will
Peer Mediator
 
Posts: 11309
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 11:13 pm
Location: In the darkness, where fear and knowing are one

Postby mrsleeve91 » Sat Oct 11, 2008 1:20 pm

All Im saying is there has to be the same force pushing on the 2nd cluster in the opposite direction as the way the diff comes out, right?

ok Im done explaining myself. You have made a valid ponit and I will take it into considersation to make another brace.

Ive helped friends with several different managment systems and the best (while complicated ) is Wolf 3D. I have the V4+.

Sorry Atilla fun, the trans you sent me in my my friends white Fiero now. Mine came off egay.

So on with the pics! :thumbleft:
Image
Image
Bringing it home from the body shop
Image
Oil pressure, boost and EGT in this one
Image
And my W/B o2
Image
LS2 coil packs
Image
Before paint, just funny, A Fiero with 5" exhaust
Image
mrsleeve91
 
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 7:54 pm
Location: Tucson, USA

Postby Series8217 » Sat Oct 11, 2008 1:32 pm

The Dark Side of Will wrote:
mrsleeve91 wrote:there has to be the same force pushing the 2nd gear cluster towards the drivers side. But cause the bell side is weaker than the drivers it comes out the bell side.


Say what? :scratch:

Series8217 wrote:Does the output shaft get pushed toward the input shaft or is that force balanced by the transfer of power to the diff gear?


The diff is pushed to the right. The input shaft is pushed to the left. The output has a force to the right from the input shaft and a force to the left from the diff. Only the NET of these two forces act on the output.

I don't have the center distance between the output shaft and diff handy, but if I did, I could do a BOTEC and figure out which way the output is pushed. Assuming an equal helix angle, I'd guess the output is pushed to the left, because the tooth loading on the final drive mesh is MUCH higher than the tooth loading on the shifted gears.


I would say so too. It doesn't seem the input shaft is designed for very strong thrust loads. It just has a big ball bearing at one end. No flat roller bearing like the output shaft.
User avatar
Series8217
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Postby CincinnatiFiero » Sat Oct 11, 2008 1:34 pm

And I thought my 3" was bad ass :(
User avatar
CincinnatiFiero
 
Posts: 2661
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 2:47 pm
Location: Columbus, Ohio

Postby The Dark Side of Will » Sat Oct 11, 2008 5:18 pm

Series8217 wrote:I would say so too. It doesn't seem the input shaft is designed for very strong thrust loads. It just has a big ball bearing at one end. No flat roller bearing like the output shaft.


Both the output and input have sealed bearings that can take thrust loads at the outer ends, and flat rollers that don't care much about axial load or position at the inner ends.
User avatar
The Dark Side of Will
Peer Mediator
 
Posts: 11309
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 11:13 pm
Location: In the darkness, where fear and knowing are one

Postby Series8217 » Sat Oct 11, 2008 6:57 pm

The Dark Side of Will wrote:
Series8217 wrote:I would say so too. It doesn't seem the input shaft is designed for very strong thrust loads. It just has a big ball bearing at one end. No flat roller bearing like the output shaft.


Both the output and input have sealed bearings that can take thrust loads at the outer ends, and flat rollers that don't care much about axial load or position at the inner ends.


On the bellhousing end of the case they're the same; just roller bearings that can only control axial loads. At the case end, the input shaft has a round ball bearing on that controls thrust and axial loads. The output shaft has the addition of a flat roller thrust bearing with the rollers oriented radially... the input shaft doesn't have that..
User avatar
Series8217
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Postby The Dark Side of Will » Sat Oct 11, 2008 7:22 pm

I haven't used the aftermarket bearings in a rebuild yet, so all the bearings I've dealt with have been the completely sealed stock variety and I don't know what's in them.

On the 3.61 boxes there is a needle thrust bearing between 1st gear and the FD pinion. This is swapped in 3.94 boxes for a thrust washer.

Sure sounds like the Germans are expecting higher axial loads on the output shaft.
User avatar
The Dark Side of Will
Peer Mediator
 
Posts: 11309
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 11:13 pm
Location: In the darkness, where fear and knowing are one

Postby Series8217 » Sat Oct 11, 2008 8:04 pm

Yeah that's the thrust bearing I was thinking of. The one between the pinion and the idler for 1st.
User avatar
Series8217
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Postby Aaron » Sat Oct 11, 2008 9:03 pm

So, that's sweet. Two 3.4 DOHC turbocharged, A/W intercooled black GTs. We should go to the track sometime.
88GT 3.4 DOHC Turbo
Gooch wrote:Way to go douche. You are like a one-man, fiero-destroying machine.
User avatar
Aaron
post pics of gay porn
 
Posts: 6772
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 4:15 am

Postby The Dark Side of Will » Sat Oct 11, 2008 9:48 pm

Series8217 wrote:Yeah that's the thrust bearing I was thinking of. The one between the pinion and the idler for 1st.


Yeah, I don't really get all those needles in the box. When they're spinning there's no load on them and when they're loaded, they're not spinning, so it's a pretty easy life for a bearing.
User avatar
The Dark Side of Will
Peer Mediator
 
Posts: 11309
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 11:13 pm
Location: In the darkness, where fear and knowing are one

Postby The Dark Side of Will » Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:26 am

[Cleaned up; now back to our previously scheduled ooing and ahhing]
User avatar
The Dark Side of Will
Peer Mediator
 
Posts: 11309
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 11:13 pm
Location: In the darkness, where fear and knowing are one

Postby CincinnatiFiero » Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:12 am

ooo ahhh
User avatar
CincinnatiFiero
 
Posts: 2661
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 2:47 pm
Location: Columbus, Ohio

Postby Erik » Wed Oct 15, 2008 12:01 am

Ooo eee ,ooo ah ah ting tang Walla walla ,bing bang
Erik
 
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:35 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Tech

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest