Extreme stripping out of a fiero?

AkursedX · Post by **AkursedX** » Thu Dec 04, 2008 10:12 am

THE PUNISHER wrote: I got an email as recent as last year from someone in the fiero community telling me they had a "right" to know about the car and wanted names (demanded) They went so far as to call me on several occasions.

The only right such faggots have is to gargle my Cum, population paste, baby batter.

I would have told him that I would give him the names only if he would let me teabag him on video and then he has to post it on all the Fiero boards. And he would have to give me 10k too.

The Dark Side of Will · Thu Dec 04, 2008 10:19 am

Too bad GM didn't go forward with some of these ideas... An all aluminum V6 Fiero could weigh less than 2500#, even fully optioned.

AkursedX · Post by **AkursedX** » Thu Dec 04, 2008 10:27 am

The Dark Side of Will wrote:Too bad GM didn't go forward with some of these ideas... An all aluminum V6 Fiero could weigh less than 2500#, even fully optioned.

I agree. A 3.4DOHC all-aluminum Fiero would have been one awesome car. It would have held it's own against the newer MR2, RX7, 300Z crowd for what I sure would have been a much lower price.

p8ntman442 · Post by **p8ntman442** » Thu Dec 04, 2008 12:14 pm

The Dark Side of Will wrote:Too bad GM didn't go forward with some of these ideas... An all aluminum V6 Fiero could weigh less than 2500#, even fully optioned.

One man decided there was not enough money to forge cranks, and that was that, the death of the all aluminum 2.8 turbo.

The Dark Side of Will · Thu Dec 04, 2008 1:49 pm

We know that GM ahs been mismanaged for decades... we're seeing the confirmation of that now.

AkursedX · Post by **AkursedX** » Thu Dec 04, 2008 1:57 pm

The Dark Side of Will wrote:We know that GM ahs been mismanaged for decades... we're seeing the confirmation of that now.

Amen to that.

CincinnatiFiero · Post by **CincinnatiFiero** » Thu Dec 04, 2008 10:31 pm

Just got back from my buddies house (hes a member here but never posts, I told him to post pics so hold your breath) hes got an 86SE down to 2,100lbs with a 2.8, 4spd, and a full cage. Talk about gutted, it does still have a full trunk though, full front section, etc.

THE PUNISHER · Post by **THE PUNISHER** » Fri Dec 05, 2008 9:59 am

George Ryans AP Quad 4 84 was under 2000 Lbs ... 1800 something....

darkhorizon · Post by **darkhorizon** » Fri Dec 05, 2008 12:29 pm

The gas mileage of a decent areo, 2500lb, 3800 fiero would be sickening.

CincinnatiFiero · Post by **CincinnatiFiero** » Fri Dec 05, 2008 2:46 pm

Doesn't a basic 3800 coupe weight like 2800? is 300 lbs going to make the MPG skyrocket?

The later aero coupes 87-88 and formula have the lowest drag coefficient and are the second lightest next to early 4cyl bumperpad cars. I think its the best place to start.

My buddies car still has the bumpers too. Their plan is to get their other car under 2,000lbs with the 2.8.

darkhorizon · Post by **darkhorizon** » Fri Dec 05, 2008 3:19 pm

CincinnatiFiero wrote:Doesn't a basic 3800 coupe weight like 2800? is 300 lbs going to make the MPG skyrocket?

The later aero coupes 87-88 and formula have the lowest drag coefficient and are the second lightest next to early 4cyl bumperpad cars. I think its the best place to start.

My buddies car still has the bumpers too. Their plan is to get their other car under 2,000lbs with the 2.8.

I never really said that the mpg will go up due to the lightness, its already close to 40 as it is in a 88coupe.

Mach10 · Post by **Mach10** » Fri Dec 05, 2008 4:53 pm

darkhorizon wrote:The gas mileage of a decent areo, 2500lb, 3800 fiero would stillbe sickening.

FTFY :salute:

Depending on how heavy you're into it, I've heard 8mpg out of these things