QFT.Atilla the Fun wrote:
And quit trolling my thread.
Moderator: crzyone
QFT.Atilla the Fun wrote:
Lol... And as far as the '80's and early '90's are concerned, an E28 or E34 M5 will eat a third gen alive, in a straight line and around corners.Atilla the Fun wrote: Don't ever use a mere bimmer to attack third-gen possibilities. Trying that just makes you look stupid.
Series8217 wrote:but they're on the way to Vorshlag now.
Don't ever use a mere Enzo to attack Fiero possibilities. Trying that just makes you look stupid.Atilla the Fun wrote:Don't ever use a mere bimmer to attack third-gen possibilities. Trying that just makes you look stupid.
There's a difference between feeding and baiting...Series8217 wrote:Will, you're just feeding the trolls..
I was more wondering about the structural differences between the two bodies, rather than the differences between bolt-in parts. How hard would it be to build an AWD E46 M3, for example? Does the AWD hardware bolt into the M3 body after modifying the floorpan for the T-case? Are the front frame rails and strut towers different like they are on an E30? Would it be better to graft the M3 rear quarter/fenders onto an AWD car?Series8217 wrote:Information on the changes from 2WD to AWD E46 cars....
http://www.e46fanatics.com/forum/attach ... 1257119324
I don't think it's practical to adapt the E46 AWD transfer to a T56.
That's not unusual for modern (2000+) AWD. Subaru VDC does the same thing. It works well for travel over snow, ice, dirt, mud, uneven surfaces, though I'm not sure how the driving dynamics are for high-performance cars on those surfaces or on tarmac. It depends on how fast the system responds to wheelspin. They're still putting torsen diffs in most AWD performance cars.The Dark Side of Will wrote: The E46 and all subsequent BMW AWD systems used until "X-Drive" had a fixed torque split, but *NO* limited slip device... totally open center diff (and front and rear, for that matter). They controlled wheel spin via the ABS/Stability control applying the brakes to a spinning wheel.
No big deal. AWD or not, I'm not building an E46 without leaving the ABS/SC intact.IOW, without the ABS/SC, the T-case sucks at teh AWD.
No joke... pretty silly to get rid of it.Series8217 wrote: No big deal. AWD or not, I'm not building an E46 without leaving the ABS/SC intact.
I'll look into it once I have a V8 drivetrain on hand, but I'm not going to make it a goal. I will keep AWD in mind when I mount the motor (i.e. I'll put the axle centerline in the right spot relative to the oil pan), so that I could add it later if it's possible.The Dark Side of Will wrote: AWD?
The strength of the 8.8 and the availability of gear ratios are the main reasons. The 8.8 is well proven behind the torque of a V8. I doubt even the P60B40 (that's the V8 from the E46 M3 GTR ALMS cars) made more than 350 ft-lbs; that was only a 4.0L motor. There are also many available LSD options for the 8.8.The Dark Side of Will wrote:Why the 8.8?
BMW diffs are pretty strong... although the availability of numerically high gear ratios in the 210mm size is kind of sparse.