quad 4 fiero

Dragstrip, autocross, and all track posts go here.

Moderator: Series8217

Post Reply
product1620
Posts: 1273
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 9:21 pm
Location: Crunkville, North Cacalacka

quad 4 fiero

Post by product1620 »

Just curious, what kind of performance will you get out of a stock quad 4 HO in a fiero, such as 1/4 mile times, and what kind of weight distribution are we talking (what does the engine weigh in at, compared to the stock 2.8).

thanks
"the un-wanted step child"
Chris
1998 Mustang GT
Image
You can't piss on what you can't catch.
befarrer
Posts: 1085
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 12:18 am
Location: Alberta

Post by befarrer »

I believe the engine is about the same weight or less than the 2.5L.

I havent had mine to the track yet. But a Quad 4 in a front wheel drive (poor grip) Olds Calais does the 1/4 in 14.7 seconds. Which is the 190HP W41 model, but I think Grand Am's and other HO Quad cars were doing the 1/4 in high 14's, and low 15's, trapping at mid 90MPH speeds.

This is what my fairly stock 86 Base coupe weighs:

Front: 550KG (1212/5Lbs)
Rear: 760KG (1675.5Lbs)
Both: 1290KG (2843.9Lbs)

I had 2/3 of a tank of gas, 50 lbs of tools in the trunk, and another 20lbs of other stuff. All my spare and jack and stuff, me in the car (160 lbs), and the battery is in the stock location. Car has a Dodge Shadow spoiler, power trunk release, no power windows or mirrors or A/C, aftermarket power door locks (~2lbs), and a sunroof. Almost forgot, I have a 5-speed Getrac 282.

Hope that helped.

OH, here are some stock dyno graphs scanned from a flyer or something, click on the links at the bottom of the posts:

http://www.quad4forums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=5619

As for wheel horsepower in a Fiero, a guy on P.F.F. dyno'd his rebuilt HO in his indy, posted the dyno chart, and got 166WHP, with no A/C, and basically the exact same as me for the drivetrain.
product1620
Posts: 1273
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 9:21 pm
Location: Crunkville, North Cacalacka

Post by product1620 »

so about low 14's in a fiero.

Thanks for all the info, + for you.
1998 Mustang GT
Image
You can't piss on what you can't catch.
p8ntman442
cant get enough of this site!
Posts: 3289
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 2:37 pm

Post by p8ntman442 »

mid-low mid 14's in a fiero probably. That 14.7 hasnt been acomplished by any other w41 driver, since motortrend made the claim. The car that they drove, was not a W41, even though the article was on the w41, it seems gm gave them a modded quad 442. Possibly a c41 prepped calais.
"I wanna make a porno starring us. Well, not just us, also these two foreign bitches."
befarrer
Posts: 1085
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 12:18 am
Location: Alberta

Post by befarrer »

I've been telling people, low to mid 15's for mine. With the altitude, and my driving, and my car doesnt like getting 2nd when the revs are above 4000RPM. Takes a second or two to get it.
product1620
Posts: 1273
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 9:21 pm
Location: Crunkville, North Cacalacka

Post by product1620 »

how well do they respond to boost in stock form? Is the C/R too high to run a decent amount?
1998 Mustang GT
Image
You can't piss on what you can't catch.
befarrer
Posts: 1085
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 12:18 am
Location: Alberta

Post by befarrer »

Get a low output if you plan to boost. They are 160HP, and 155 torque, but have 9.5:1 compression. A high output, like what I have is 10.1:1 stock.

The difference is in the pistons, the low outputs are dished. The other differences that the HO has are:
lightened flywheel
under drive crank pulley
bigger injectors
more aggressive ECM tuning
lumpier cams
different intake and exhaust manifolds (early models, later models shared same manifolds from LO to HO)

A HO can take boost, but only up to like 5 PSI because of the high compression.
Post Reply