Daytona 07 Dyno results.

[Shaun41178(2)]

I still have to get the rest of the charts from the otehr cars. Those being, a 3800 turbo, a 2.8, and a 4.9 These are just a couple that I have put into jpeg form so far.

These are all SAE corrected.

All 4 of these dynos are with a manual transmission. V8Archie and Drcpu had the 6 spd tranny, and Tom and Kris had the getrag 5 spd tranny.

if you notice, the 3.4 dohc on spray made more tq then a 377 cubic inch v8












I will work on getting the rest up within the next few days. Or just go here for the other numbers

http://floridafieros.org/daytona2007/dyno.html

Out of the 14 or so that said they were going to dyno, I beleive only 8 actually dynoed.

[Jinxmutt]

WOW. I'm unimpressed at those numbers. I figured we would see some higher postings than that. I can't believe how well my untuned base pull compares to those V8 cars.

[Unsafe At Any Speed]

The 3800 put down some pretty good numbers didn't it?

But yeah, those other numbers are fairly weak. Have to give those who actually dynoed credit though.

[stimpy]

Just comparing. Bone stock L67 3800, CAI, WCF headers, 3" exhaust. No other mods.

Seems like the V8's have torque to move mountains, too bad it's wasted in a Fiero. Even my puny 240 ftp had a habit of turning tires into dust. That's why I'm so horny about the HF 3.6 V6. More HP then an L67 with a bit less torque. I think that will make a very drivable package for the baller who can get it done.

[Shaun41178(2)]

Been reading the thread over on Fagland about the dyno numbers and just as I expected, everyone is blaming the dyno for being wrong. Noone is blaming the tune on the cars, and how none of them were running right. Black smoke pouring out of some of them especially the V8 cars.

But yea its the dyno thats wrong.

I mean V8Archie is already heading back to a local dyno in chicago as he knows his numbers sucked, and it makes him look horrible as a builder of V8 cars. I mean he claims to know everything about V8's except how to make power out of them. So now after 50+ years of his life and never being to a dyno, he will be going twice within 1 week. Seems he is trying to save some face here.

But yea it was the fualty dyno I am sure.

[whipped]

nobody sprang for the WB?

[Shaun41178(2)]

The widebands were in there, I just did not include them in teh graphs I posted.

Oh yea just to add, a bone stock LT1 Chevy impala at the dyno as well but only had a k&N intake on it dynoed 219 whp. Correct me if I am wrong but the impalas were at 275 crank hp according to gm. Which puts the dyno number of 220 right on.

[AntiCooter]

Impala LT1's were iron head motors rated at 260, the F-body aluminum head motors got the higher HP rating.

[Shaun41178(2)]

Ohh my bad. Good catch there. So a 260 crank hp motor, was putting down 220 at the wheels in a impala. So the dyno was not off even though thats what everyone wants to say.