Think it's about time to spin some rollers (Aaron's dyno)

Fiero topics such as vendor reviews experiences, car shows, Fiero buys acquisitions, Fiero Photography.

Moderator: Series8217

User avatar
Aaron
I just wanna ride my motorcycle
Posts: 5957
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 5:15 am
Contact:

Post by Aaron »

Shaun41178(2) wrote:with a 1.25 correction factor? still got that sheet with the correction factor on it you could post?

SAE states that you can't use altitude as a factor and expect accurate results, yet aaron wants to argue that you can. Ddin't you read the links posted? I mean its not like the SAE guys know what they are talking about. They have no experience in the matter.
Yet the results are still accurate. It's the best way we have to correct for altitude. Otherwise, every dyno in the world more than 10ft above sea level is useless.

My math has shown about 3.5%/1000ft on a N/A or SC car, and half for for a turbo car.
88GT 3.4 DOHC Turbo
Gooch wrote:Way to go douche. You are like a one-man, fiero-destroying machine.
User avatar
Series8217
1988 Fiero Track Car
Posts: 5978
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 9:47 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Post by Series8217 »

Show us your math, Mr. I'm-A-Better-Engineer-Than-The-SAE-Guys.
Billybo455
Posts: 182
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:54 pm
Location: central fl

Post by Billybo455 »

enlighten me on what i'm going to tell you on how to make your car spool faster?
my fiero is faster then yours. the end. except you fieroX :P
stimpy
Who wants Ice Cream?
Posts: 2599
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 2:29 pm
Contact:

Post by stimpy »

Congratz on getting the car Dyno ready & the impressive numbers. Try not to kill yourself.
My Fiero is now a Finale. The end.
User avatar
Aaron
I just wanna ride my motorcycle
Posts: 5957
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 5:15 am
Contact:

Post by Aaron »

Series8217 wrote:Show us your math, Mr. I'm-A-Better-Engineer-Than-The-SAE-Guys.
OMFG Steven. It is basic fucking math. We learned this shit in high school.

Sea level = 14.69psi
Colorado Springs = 11.7 (That is the cells that my piggyback is at with ign on, engine off).

First of all, just found this interesting. 14.69 / 11.7 = 1.255. Look familiar?

Anyways, we lose about 3psi due to altitude. For an N/A car, this is a 20.4% loss in air pressure, which would equate to a 20.4% loss in power.

Back in high school, I had a friend who moved here from Texas, on the coast, who had a modded GTP. Via his data-logging software, he saw dead on 15psi. Added to the 14.69, he had 29.69psia. However here, due to how a positive displacement blower works, he only saw 12psi. Combined with the lower atmospheric pressure, he only got 23.7psia. He saw a 20.2% drop in psia, equating to a rough 20.2% drop in power, near identical to the N/A numbers.

However, things are different for a turbocharger, since boost (Pressure above ambient), is kept equal at your peak power. So for me, it was 14psi. Added to the 14.69, at sea level, I'd have 28.69psia. Up here, that drops to 11.7 + 14 = 25.7psia. A 10.4% loss in power, roughly half that of the N/A and SC cars.

Thanks Stimpy, I've already dropped the boost back down to 8.7. The car is still scary fast at that, and more than I'll ever need.
Billybo455 wrote:enlighten me on what i'm going to tell you on how to make your car spool faster?
The same thing you've said like 4 times now, that's common fucking sense int he tuning world. Rich, retard timing. I ran it rich, and I pulled 20* of timing. Car ran like shit. It was too much of a change too soon for my engine to like. For some reason, my engine wants smooth adjustments to the cells. For example, under vacuum, my cells are 10 (The FTC1 value for neutrality, no change to the MAF signal). However, at full boost, the values are 9.1 across the RPM board. I initially tried going right from 10 at 11.7psia, to 9.1 at the 12.2 mark (Meaning as soon as boost came on, I went to a 9.1 multiplier, and held this throughout the pressure/rev range). The engine hated the vacuum/boost gateway. So for each bump in pressure (.5psi), I dropped the multiplier by .1 or .2. So now my cells go 9.9, 9.7, 9.5, 9.3, then 9.1. The engine loves it. Well, at 3,000-3500rpm, I made the multiplier 15, which causes it to go pig rich, and pulled 20* of timing in the same cells. The engine would spool nice, but it was overall really poor performance. I'd get bucking, a lot of smoke, and a poor transition back to normal fuel/timing. Maybe it's my motor, maybe it's the piggyback, but whatever it is, I'd need to fade into the rich/timing retard, and fade back out, and that isn't practical. Maybe if I could make adjustments every .1psi and 100rpm, but that's not how my piggyback works.

If I really cared about the spool time, I could trigger a 20-50shot of nitrous at 2,000rpm. But it isn't bad, I just have to rev it. So I need to wait until 3500-4000rpm for boost, but I can run to 7200rpm. What's the point in having boost at 2k? If I wanted off idle boost, I would have swapped a 3800.
88GT 3.4 DOHC Turbo
Gooch wrote:Way to go douche. You are like a one-man, fiero-destroying machine.
User avatar
Shaun41178(2)
Posts: 8369
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: Ben Phelps is an alleged scammer

Post by Shaun41178(2) »

Aaron wrote: However, things are different for a turbocharger, since boost (Pressure above ambient), is kept equal at your peak power. So for me, it was 14psi. Added to the 14.69, at sea level, I'd have 28.69psia. Up here, that drops to 11.7 + 14 = 25.7psia. A 10.4% loss in power, roughly half that of the N/A and SC cars.
so you dynoed at 14 psi then.
User avatar
Aaron
I just wanna ride my motorcycle
Posts: 5957
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 5:15 am
Contact:

Post by Aaron »

Yah, I thought I had said that, I guess not.
88GT 3.4 DOHC Turbo
Gooch wrote:Way to go douche. You are like a one-man, fiero-destroying machine.
User avatar
Series8217
1988 Fiero Track Car
Posts: 5978
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 9:47 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Post by Series8217 »

How are you measuring your boost again? You have a boost gauge? Or is it MAP readings in your datalog?
User avatar
Shaun41178(2)
Posts: 8369
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: Ben Phelps is an alleged scammer

Post by Shaun41178(2) »

I am pretty sure I saw in another post you said 8.7 or stock wastegate spring pressure.

Look aaron untill you get a dyno nearer to sea level with less of a correction factor, there will be skepticism on what it would really make.

However just use it as a tuning tool. Take it back, get your tables right, and get it tuned in on the dyno. Or turn it back down to 8 psi and tune on the street on the highway late at night. take someone with you so you can have an extra set of eyes on the wideband. Tune 500 rpm at a time if you have to. Thats what I did with mine
p8ntman442
cant get enough of this site!
Posts: 3289
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 2:37 pm

Post by p8ntman442 »

Aaron wrote:My thread, I'll say whatever the fuck I want to.

Why aren't you working on your car?

1) house
2) 2 kids
3) race cars (covered in motorsports section)
4)93 scx in the garage getting a new motor (4 seats works better than 2 when you have kids)

5) at work 10 hrs a day
6) hijacking your thread for an hour a day.

I'm very busy. Someday when you have a family to feed and keep warm, you will understand.
"I wanna make a porno starring us. Well, not just us, also these two foreign bitches."
User avatar
Aaron
I just wanna ride my motorcycle
Posts: 5957
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 5:15 am
Contact:

Post by Aaron »

Series8217 wrote:How are you measuring your boost again? You have a boost gauge? Or is it MAP readings in your datalog?
I've got a number of different ways. The FTC1 datalogs boost, my WBO2 can if I wanted it to, my Autometer boost gauge, and on the dyno I had him take a MAP reading.
Shaun41178(2) wrote:I am pretty sure I saw in another post you said 8.7 or stock wastegate spring pressure.

Look aaron untill you get a dyno nearer to sea level with less of a correction factor, there will be skepticism on what it would really make.

However just use it as a tuning tool. Take it back, get your tables right, and get it tuned in on the dyno. Or turn it back down to 8 psi and tune on the street on the highway late at night. take someone with you so you can have an extra set of eyes on the wideband. Tune 500 rpm at a time if you have to. Thats what I did with mine
My stock spring pressure is 8.7, I turned it up for the dyno run. I've since turned it back down.

Well I'm not going to post up anymore numbers, so don't get your hopes up. As I told Levi, I could run a 13, and you'd all laugh. Anything less, and you'd say the track was downhill.

It's useless as a tuning tool. It's way too expensive, and the parts I need to tune are, as you said, easily done on the street with a friend. We're going to work on it Thursday.
88GT 3.4 DOHC Turbo
Gooch wrote:Way to go douche. You are like a one-man, fiero-destroying machine.
User avatar
Series8217
1988 Fiero Track Car
Posts: 5978
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 9:47 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Post by Series8217 »

Aaron wrote:
Series8217 wrote:How are you measuring your boost again? You have a boost gauge? Or is it MAP readings in your datalog?
I've got a number of different ways. The FTC1 datalogs boost, my WBO2 can if I wanted it to, my Autometer boost gauge, and on the dyno I had him take a MAP reading.
So what method are you actually using? What was the MAP reading on the dyno?

You're using a manual boost controller with like a spring right?
darkhorizon
Posts: 460
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 2:41 am

Post by darkhorizon »

I fail to see how 14psi at 10000ft =/ 14psi at 0ft?

How can you correct on a turbo car? air is air, its not going to be a different flavor at that altitude... It might make your turbo work a bit out of its efficnecy range.. but you cant claim that will make you 25% horsepower ont he top...

now SC cars, I totally believe that correction, because its positive displacement. it will only flow so much air per rev, simple as that. Same goes for n/a, its based on RPM specifically as to how much air is coming in. A turbo will increase the volume to whatever it needs to make the wastegate open at a specific PSi.

The turbo will be spinning faster at 10000ft, than at 0 feet, but the total air delivered will be roughly the same. (possibly more at 10000ft, due to less exhaust restriction due to the lower air pressure, but thats a serious stretch)
the poi
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 5:31 pm
Location: UCLA/Pasadena
Contact:

Post by the poi »

Ya, the SAE corr is nonsense on a turbo car, which controls it's own atmospheric pressure. 330hp is still a respectable number though!
Chris Wiita
Image
1995 965 - woo racecar
darkhorizon
Posts: 460
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 2:41 am

Post by darkhorizon »

At the end of your run your making 160whp, isnt that like 30-40whp less than what a stock dohc makes at that rpm?
User avatar
Series8217
1988 Fiero Track Car
Posts: 5978
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 9:47 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Post by Series8217 »

darkhorizon wrote:At the end of your run your making 160whp, isnt that like 30-40whp less than what a stock dohc makes at that rpm?
Here's my completely NA DOHC dyno at exactly sea level. You can see the correction factor is 1.00 due to the nice conditions that day. Mods are custom intake, some porting of the manifolds, balanced and blueprinted: http://www.pbase.com/series8217/image/8 ... /large.jpg

Here it is overlayed on Aaron's:
Image
blue is hp, red is torque.
User avatar
Aaron
I just wanna ride my motorcycle
Posts: 5957
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 5:15 am
Contact:

Post by Aaron »

Series8217 wrote: So what method are you actually using? What was the MAP reading on the dyno?

You're using a manual boost controller with like a spring right?
All of them, except for the WB. But generally, I set it with the MBC, and let it be. Right now, it's back stock (8.7), verified by the gauge.

Yes I am. Works good. It isn't very precise, but to be honest, I don't need to be very precise, so it works out.
darkhorizon wrote:I fail to see how 14psi at 10000ft =/ 14psi at 0ft?

How can you correct on a turbo car? air is air, its not going to be a different flavor at that altitude... It might make your turbo work a bit out of its efficnecy range.. but you cant claim that will make you 25% horsepower ont he top...

now SC cars, I totally believe that correction, because its positive displacement. it will only flow so much air per rev, simple as that. Same goes for n/a, its based on RPM specifically as to how much air is coming in. A turbo will increase the volume to whatever it needs to make the wastegate open at a specific PSi.

The turbo will be spinning faster at 10000ft, than at 0 feet, but the total air delivered will be roughly the same. (possibly more at 10000ft, due to less exhaust restriction due to the lower air pressure, but thats a serious stretch)
I just fucking explained this, mathematically at that. You are a complete ignorant fool. Go read the numbers again. 14psi of boost. What is boost? It is pressure ABOVE AMBIENT.
the poi wrote:Ya, the SAE corr is nonsense on a turbo car, which controls it's own atmospheric pressure. 330hp is still a respectable number though!
The turbocharger does not control its own atmospheric pressure, it builds upon a referenced ambient pressure. That's what the top port of the wastegate is for. Vent to atmosphere, the turbo makes 14psi above ambient pressure. So I made 14psi above 11.7, not 14 over 14.69. Thus I'm down 3psi than I would be at sea level. Essentially, I could run 17psi, without a correction factor, and put down very similar numbers that I would at sea level, with no CF.

I have my WG setup to atmosphere reference, not like on, say airplanes, where they use the vent port on the WG to overcome the affects of altitude.

As I said before, take the CF, divide it in half, then apply it, and that will be roughly what my car is realistically making. 376whp.
Last edited by Aaron on Tue Oct 28, 2008 12:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
88GT 3.4 DOHC Turbo
Gooch wrote:Way to go douche. You are like a one-man, fiero-destroying machine.
User avatar
Aaron
I just wanna ride my motorcycle
Posts: 5957
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 5:15 am
Contact:

Post by Aaron »

the poi wrote:Ya, the SAE corr is nonsense on a turbo car, which controls it's own atmospheric pressure. 330hp is still a respectable number though!
Also, you should start posting more, you have a sweet build and I'd love to see something like a "build thread" about it. With more pictures than my internet can load.
88GT 3.4 DOHC Turbo
Gooch wrote:Way to go douche. You are like a one-man, fiero-destroying machine.
Billybo455
Posts: 182
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:54 pm
Location: central fl

Post by Billybo455 »

You've got it backwards. so i must not know common knowledge. the bunch if fuel and no timing only works with an ignition cutting launch control. aim for a 13-13.5 afr with as much timing as you can run until about 3 lbs of resistance.
my fiero is faster then yours. the end. except you fieroX :P
User avatar
Aaron
I just wanna ride my motorcycle
Posts: 5957
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 5:15 am
Contact:

Post by Aaron »

Billybo455 wrote:You've got it backwards. so i must not know common knowledge. the bunch if fuel and no timing only works with an ignition cutting launch control. aim for a 13-13.5 afr with as much timing as you can run until about 3 lbs of resistance.
Oh, it worked, there's no doubt about that. Its side affects were just not worth the spool time.

I'm not sure I understand the second part. 3lbs of resistance?
88GT 3.4 DOHC Turbo
Gooch wrote:Way to go douche. You are like a one-man, fiero-destroying machine.
Post Reply