whipped wrote:Adding heat to the cooling system doesn't sound like a good idea. How about instead you remove capacity from the system? Install a PVC yard sign over the front of your radiator. At least then you can remove it without all this extra "water" hassle.
Why would I do this? You do know what thermostats are for, right? I could have the biggest motherfucking radiator in the world, with a 40 gallon cooling system, and the car would still warm up just the same. I'm trying to get the water to 195*
faster. I'm quite sure I won't have a problem with overheating.
jelly2m8 wrote:Heres a rather simple suggestion, have you considered the possibility of your heatercore being partially plugged?
if your car is comming up to tempertaure properly, you should be getting sufficent heat from the heater.
I know when I drove fiero's in the winter, if you kept the heat blasting you would have to roll the window down when it was 15 below outside.
The system worked great before the swap, and it even works good now. It's just not quite as warm as I think it should be. But I have also decreased flow to the core by almost 50%, which plausibly explains the low heater temps.
If my cooling system was setup like stock, yes. But the water line supplying the heater core flows maybe half as much as it did stock.
You didn't drive my Fiero, that has the heater core looped with the turbo cooling line, that's 3/8" diameter, and goes through small banjo fittings to the turbo.