Page 2 of 2

Re: Storm Trooper Maintenance Thread

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2020 4:27 pm
by The Dark Side of Will
The lower ball joint taper in the knuckle was messed up; I didn't notice this when I put new lower ball joints in it last summer... here comes another lower ball joint. I pulled a knuckle out of "the stash" that looks better. I'll talk to my prototype machinist about snagging a 2in/ft tapered reamer and see about repairing the current one, but need the car on the road sooner than that.

Re: Storm Trooper Maintenance Thread

Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2020 1:24 pm
by The Dark Side of Will
The Dark Side of Will wrote: Wed Feb 26, 2020 8:54 am The 1988 Fiero lower ball joint taper appears to be 2 inches per foot (~4.75 degrees half-angle), which is kind of weird. Now to find a 2in/ft tapered reamer to fix the lower ball joint taper in my right knuckle...
'88 upper ball joint taper is 10 degrees

Re: Storm Trooper Maintenance Thread

Posted: Sun Sep 03, 2023 8:10 pm
by The Dark Side of Will
The flats on Rodney Dickman's "zero lash" sway bar end links are significantly too narrow for a normal wrench.

Enter the way too complicated solution:

Image

Send-Cut-Send has a minimum order, so once we got their system to interpret my .DXF correctly (They use R12 .DXF... WTF?) they sent me 11 to fulfill minimum order cost.

Image

And in action

Image

I spread one trying to get the nut under the control arm tight. I guess it's good they sent me 11. I'm not sure there's room to make one that won't spread... maybe I'll play with it on a spare control arm.

Re: Storm Trooper Maintenance Thread

Posted: Sun Sep 03, 2023 10:35 pm
by pmbrunelle
I have also used sendcutsend. I like them.

I had an issue (on my 84-87 Fiero) with Rodney Dickman zero-lash links whereby the ball-and-socket joints didn't have enough range of motion to work on my Fiero:
RD endlink.jpg
RD endlink.jpg (336.13 KiB) Viewed 5651 times
I'm not sure what went wrong, but it's something to watch out for.

Re: Storm Trooper Maintenance Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 04, 2023 2:35 am
by The Dark Side of Will
Is your sway bar upside down?

Re: Storm Trooper Maintenance Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 04, 2023 9:50 am
by ericjon262
The Dark Side of Will wrote: Mon Sep 04, 2023 2:35 am Is your sway bar upside down?
it doesn't look like it to me, otherwise that hump would hit the steering rack right?

Re: Storm Trooper Maintenance Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 04, 2023 12:55 pm
by pmbrunelle
The Dark Side of Will wrote: Sun Sep 03, 2023 8:10 pmI'm not sure there's room to make one that won't spread... maybe I'll play with it on a spare control arm.
Sendcutsend does have steel options which are stronger than mild steel. I don't know what you used.

********************************************************************************

I don't think my sway bar is upside down.

I followed the service manual which says to put the spade-shaped end of the sway bar on the left side of the car.
Service Manual.jpg
Service Manual.jpg (180.73 KiB) Viewed 5620 times
I sent an email asking Rodney about it. If this doesn't work out, I'll probably run rubber links for the time being.

Re: Storm Trooper Maintenance Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 04, 2023 6:51 pm
by The Dark Side of Will
That's why I asked... it does have a specific orientation. Funky. Is that before you lowered your control arm pivot?

Re: Storm Trooper Maintenance Thread

Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2023 7:56 pm
by The Dark Side of Will
pmbrunelle wrote: Sun Sep 03, 2023 10:35 pm I have also used sendcutsend. I like them.

I had an issue (on my 84-87 Fiero) with Rodney Dickman zero-lash links whereby the ball-and-socket joints didn't have enough range of motion to work on my Fiero:
RD endlink.jpg

I'm not sure what went wrong, but it's something to watch out for.
Are you shocks installed in this photo? The UCA touching the crossmember is a drop limiter, but I thought the shock was a "higher" droop limiter.

Re: Storm Trooper Maintenance Thread

Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2023 6:46 pm
by pmbrunelle
I don't remember if the shocks were installed at that point, so I could recheck the endlinks with the shocks installed. If what you're saying is true, then there is a specific assembly order that must be followed to avoid damaging things.

Yes, the shock droop limiter is above the crossmember droop limiter.

I think the crossmember droop limiter serves to place the LCA at the correct position for shock installation. Since in service the crossmember droop limiter is not used, this allows the crossmember droop limiter to be built cheap/flimsy.

Re: Storm Trooper Maintenance Thread

Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2023 8:41 pm
by The Dark Side of Will
I guess you mean install the shocks fully extended. With a little muscle, they can be R&R'd with the vehicle on the ground just by turning the wheels full lock.

Re: Storm Trooper Maintenance Thread

Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2023 3:42 pm
by pmbrunelle
The Dark Side of Will wrote: Fri Sep 08, 2023 8:41 pm I guess you mean install the shocks fully extended. With a little muscle, they can be R&R'd with the vehicle on the ground just by turning the wheels full lock.
I was speaking in the context of installing the shock on the production line.

Re: Storm Trooper Maintenance Thread

Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2023 4:12 pm
by The Dark Side of Will
pmbrunelle wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2023 3:42 pm
The Dark Side of Will wrote: Fri Sep 08, 2023 8:41 pm I guess you mean install the shocks fully extended. With a little muscle, they can be R&R'd with the vehicle on the ground just by turning the wheels full lock.
I was speaking in the context of installing the shock on the production line.
That's what I inferred. Then using production tooling to drive the upper mount bolts then pulls the suspension up to the shock's droop limit. Good observation.