No replacement for displacement.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNMfhe39 ... e=youtu.be
R35 vs Old muscle cars
Moderator: crzyone
- Shaun41178(2)
- Posts: 8368
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:12 pm
- Location: Ben Phelps is an alleged scammer
R35 vs Old muscle cars
FieroPhrek working on that ls4 swap for 18 years and counting now. 18 years!!!!! LOL
530 whp is greater than 312
530 whp is greater than 312
-
- Peer Mediator
- Posts: 15626
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 11:13 pm
- Location: In the darkness, where fear and knowing are one
- Contact:
Re: R35 vs Old muscle cars
Is it that time of month, Shawn?
- crzyone
- JDM Power FTW
- Posts: 4654
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 12:40 am
- Location: Whitecourt, Alberta, Canada
Re: R35 vs Old muscle cars
And the GTR is a docile daily driver if you want it to be vs built muscle cars that are anything but.
The R35 is a whale, only thing I don't like about it. They could have done better than 3800lbs...
FAAAAAAAT!
The R35 is a whale, only thing I don't like about it. They could have done better than 3800lbs...
FAAAAAAAT!
Re: R35 vs Old muscle cars
Wow it is a fatty. I'm not a fan of it either.
-
- Posts: 2824
- Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 5:34 pm
- Location: Aiken, SC
Re: R35 vs Old muscle cars
I don't really see the point in this. you've got a car that has infinitely more R&D put into it, Vs some 40+ year old iron... I could see it if the guys were acting like the GTR was garbage, but from what I saw they all respected the fact that it's a pretty baddass ride. and were just out having fun. apples to apples would be a zeta chassis "camaro" against the GTR.
I'm not saying the "camaro" would win either, just that it's a much more realistic comparison.
I'm not saying the "camaro" would win either, just that it's a much more realistic comparison.
"I am not what you so glibly call to be a civilized man. I have broken with society for reasons which I alone am able to appreciate. I am therefore not subject to it's stupid laws, and I ask you to never allude to them in my presence again."