9.11 Inside Job... MORE PROOF

[DiggityBiggity]

http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,635160132,00.html

Your concerned leader

Diggity"Are you going to ignore physics? You seem to ignore everything else!"Biggity

[Aaron]

I guess I was mislead by all the videos capturing planes flying into the buildings...

[DiggityBiggity]

I guess I was mislead by all the videos capturing planes flying into the buildings...

The planes flew into the buildings... did you read the article?? They were a distraction, as I've been saying.

Your concerned leader

Diggity"Think for yourself!"Biggity

[Aaron]

Oh, they were a distraction. And somehow, from MILES away, the totally unexperienced pilots, who from testimonials were barely able to keep the planes in the air, were able to smash into the buildings at the PRECISE levels that the bombs were planted. And when the bombs went off, at the exact moment the planes did, ironic how we only saw, FROM VIDEO, flames and explosions come out the backside of the building from the planes. Didn't see any from the bombs.

[whipped]

if it were bombs, they would have went off right before it/they collapsed. I see nothing.

Now the second question I have, is if it was an "inside job", what would there be to gain?

[EBSB52]

if it were bombs, they would have went off right before it/they collapsed. I see nothing.

Now the second question I have, is if it was an "inside job", what would there be to gain?

As far as question #2, the (not so) Patriot (ic) Act, the TSA, the antiTerrorism Bill/Law, and all kinds of 4th movement that is for less personal privacy; the gov has been wanting to push this shit for years and finally had a chance thanks to a huge act such as this.


There is such a thing as negligence and gross negligence in the law, and even though you shut your eyes real tight, if you knew or should have known that something like 9/11 was imminent then you are liable. This is a civil standard, not usually criminal. If it's criminalk they call it recklessness, enfangement, etc....

[DiggityBiggity]

And when the bombs went off, at the exact moment the planes did, ironic how we only saw, FROM VIDEO, flames and explosions come out the backside of the building from the planes. Didn't see any from the bombs.

Here are all the links describing these secondary explosions and blasts.


News Reporter Telling of Secondary Explosion
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGE ... Pulled.mp3

And another LIVE news report, reports a secondary explosion
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGE ... Pulled.mp3

CNN reports explosion before tower collapses
http://www.cnn.com/video/us/2001/09/11/ ... nn.low.ram

An archived transcript describing secondary explosions
http://archives.tcm.ie/breakingnews/200 ... y23302.asp

NYC Fire fighter talks of explosions inside buildings
http://www.prisonplanet.com/louie_cacchioli.html

More video evidence from the lobby
http://www.plaguepuppy.net/public_html/ ... /lobby.mpg

A worker reports underground explosions
http://www.plaguepuppy.net/public_html/ ... 94213hi.rm

Fire Fighters DESCRIBING! the Blasts!
http://brainwashedamerica.com/discussio ... ehouse.mpg


Minute by Minute transcripts describing more explosions
http://www.poynter.org/dg.lts/id.6074/c ... t_view.htm

More transcripts of a third explosion
http://archives.tcm.ie/breakingnews/200 ... y23301.asp

Police Chief Talks About Bombs in Building
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGE ... evices.mp3

Actual Emergency Tapes Talk of Explosions
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc_firefighters.mp3

One of the towers chief engineers discusses how the building could withstand an airplane
http://www.prisonplanet.com/video/141104clip.WMV

[DiggityBiggity]

Now the second question I have, is if it was an "inside job", what would there be to gain?

How would Larry Silverstein benefit from the destruction of building seven? The simple answer is, in the sum of $4.6 Billion Dollars. At the time of the Lease, Mr. Silverstein took out an insurance policy on his investment against terrorism. This transaction was made only 6 weeks before the terrorist attacks on 9.11.

This reported by CBS news
http://www.cbsnews.com/elements/2003/09 ... rson.shtml

and CNN
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/12/v ... .security/

Since the attacks on 9.11, the insurance company has made good on their policy. But Larry isn’t satisfied with final amount of $4.6 Billion Dollars, and is still in court trying to win up to $7 Billion.
How Larry made a quick $478 Million off of a $383 Million dollar investment
http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/ea ... /15925.htm
Forbes Magazine Quotes Larry at Looking at a Possible $4.6 Billion Dollar Profit
http://www.forbes.com/associatedpress/f ... 94990.html

The Washington Times
http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking ... -7334r.htm

And the BBC
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4075053.stm

But would Larry also benefit from the destruction of the Twin Towers? If he was capable of placing explosives into building seven, which there is no doubt he was, could he have also placed them in the 110 story buildings?

Listen to what these NYFD firefighters said as they were running out of the towers
http://brainwashedamerica.com/discussio ... ehouse.mpg

Or this firefighters eye witness account
http://brainwashedamerica.com/collapsed%20to%20dust.mpg

Or this scene..
http://www.plaguepuppy.net/public_html/ ... /lobby.mpg

Both of these clips from "9/11"
http://www.frenchculture.org/tv/programs/naudet911.html

[whipped]

Well I like to think people are above the murdering of thousands of innocent civillians purely for profit... but I guess money does talk.

I don't know. In the article it mentioned thermite, but I don't think that's an explosive at all, it's an incendiary, much like a flare.

In the same respect however, I can't say that placing it into a container (like a pipe) would not allow pressure to build fast enough for an explosion.

But - I can tell you that aluminum and magnesium (like many airplane parts are made of) can burn hot enough to melt steel, etc...

[DiggityBiggity]

Well I like to think people are above the murdering of thousands of innocent civillians purely for profit... but I guess money does talk.

I don't know. In the article it mentioned thermite, but I don't think that's an explosive at all, it's an incendiary, much like a flare.

In the same respect however, I can't say that placing it into a container (like a pipe) would not allow pressure to build fast enough for an explosion.

But - I can tell you that aluminum and magnesium (like many airplane parts are made of) can burn hot enough to melt steel, etc...

Look at the location of building 7 compared to all the other buildings in the complex.



Remember this building was not hit by an airplane.

Now, let's compare building 7 to the sky scraper in Spain in February of 2005 that burned for 17 hours.These pictures are of the skyscraper in Spain.






And now a look at building 7, only 2 hours prior to it's collapse.



Why did the Spanish sky scraper not collapse? The same reason building seven would not collapse without controlled demolitions. Up until Sept 11th 2001, no modern steel structure had EVER failed due to fire damage.

[whipped]

can't argue with pictures. :thumbleft:

[crzyone]

The building #7 is really suspicious. Maybe it was always rigged with explosives? Bombs could have been remote activated so they could claim insurance in the event of an attack?

So many possibilities, we will never know what really went on.

[DiggityBiggity]

The building #7 is really suspicious. Maybe it was always rigged with explosives? Bombs could have been remote activated so they could claim insurance in the event of an attack?

So many possibilities, we will never know what really went on.

Exactly!! Bombs WERE planted before hand.. but if that's the case... it means they KNEW about the attacks!!

Your concerned leader

Diggity"You're starting to get it"Biggity

[whipped]

what is building 7?

Maybe it housed sensitive information?

[DiggityBiggity]

what is building 7?

Maybe it housed sensitive information?

It did, in fact.

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/background/wtc7.html

Your concerned leader

Diggity"Did they run the operation from there?"Biggity

[whipped]

problem solved.

I assume it collapsed after it was evacuated? In an emergency (chaotic) event, it seems likely to destroy sensitive information by any means possible... In the chaos it's possible someone pushed the button "just in case".

I was talking about thermite earlier... that's often used around sensitive hard disks and ignited to permanently melt them into a pile of molten iron. It's very likely setting these off would start an office fire (perhaps seen as the fires in bldg 7)

[DiggityBiggity]

problem solved.

I assume it collapsed after it was evacuated? In an emergency (chaotic) event, it seems likely to destroy sensitive information by any means possible... In the chaos it's possible someone pushed the button "just in case".

I was talking about thermite earlier... that's often used around sensitive hard disks and ignited to permanently melt them into a pile of molten iron. It's very likely setting these off would start an office fire (perhaps seen as the fires in bldg 7)

Yes, it collapsed after it was evacuated.. here, watch this video.

http://infowars.com/Video/911/wtc7_pbs.WMV

Larry Silverstein in his own words during a 2002 PBS documentary called "American Rebuilds", says just that.
"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it. And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse." To this day, Mr. Silverstein has not issued a retraction to his statement.

Your concerned leader

Diggity"http://www.brainwashedamerica.com"Biggity

[whipped]

info wars... isn't that the same place/guy that put out the film about pres. bush's connection to skull and bones?

anyways, so are they saying that just building 7 was rigged with explosives, or the twin towers as well??

[DiggityBiggity]

Infowars, yes... Alex Jones... very radical, but pretty right on about most things.. not all

As far as that video, he's talking about building seven... The towers however were discussed in the article I started this thread with.. BUT.. listen to these firefighters after running out of the towers.

http://brainwashedamerica.com/discussio ... ehouse.mpg

Those firefighters were talking about the towers

Your concerned leader

Diggity"It's very disturbing, but none the less true"Biggity

[whipped]

"and then you just saw this cloud of shit chasin you"

so maybe the group of buildings originally had a more nefarious purpose, or had some secret the world couldn't know about....


Carnivore mk 1? :scratch:

and just to clarify - the PLANES weren't planned, it was the DEMOLITION. right?