Jalisurr wrote: ↑Wed Dec 27, 2023 10:03 pmI would be very cautious about used LS7 rods. They have an anti-friction coating on them from the factory that wears off naturally over time and usage, and once gone they start shedding titanium flakes which quickly destroy the engine. Ask me how I know, and what happened to my previous C6 Z06 time attack car...eHoward wrote: ↑Mon Dec 25, 2023 1:55 pm If you go used, you probably could find a set of Ti rods, on a budget. This one is $1,250:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/266472618709?m ... media=COPY
There used to be some places that were re-coating rods, but I don't know if that's still an option.
Lz9 rotating assembly weights
Moderators: The Dark Side of Will, Series8217
Re: Lz9 rotating assembly weights
That sounds like a nightmare. Thanks for the heads up. I wondered why people were pulling "good" rods.
-
- Peer Mediator
- Posts: 15679
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 11:13 pm
- Location: In the darkness, where fear and knowing are one
- Contact:
Re: Lz9 rotating assembly weights
Ditto on the protective coating. Because of the way "naked"(*) titanium galls, it must be coated with something anywhere it sees relative motion. Playing with Ti rods when you're not an OEM is difficult and expen$ive. Modifying Ti rods is downright foolhardyJalisurr wrote: ↑Wed Dec 27, 2023 10:03 pmI would be very cautious about used LS7 rods. They have an anti-friction coating on them from the factory that wears off naturally over time and usage, and once gone they start shedding titanium flakes which quickly destroy the engine. Ask me how I know, and what happened to my previous C6 Z06 time attack car...eHoward wrote: ↑Mon Dec 25, 2023 1:55 pm If you go used, you probably could find a set of Ti rods, on a budget. This one is $1,250:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/266472618709?m ... media=COPY
There used to be some places that were re-coating rods, but I don't know if that's still an option.
For the reasons cited above related to Ti and others related to the basic strength of the part, boring the big end would be a terrible idea. Cut the crank instead.Shaun41178(2) wrote: ↑Mon Dec 25, 2023 12:03 pm So the ls9 small end can be bushed I would assume, and maybe the big end bored out or a larger bearing installed? I am also unsure of the width on the ls9 rod
(*)Titanium in air is never "bare", since it immediately forms a tenacious oxide layer. The oxide layer is protective from corrosion, and there's nothing more corrosion resistant than titanium, but the oxide layer is not suitable for a mechanical interface.
- Shaun41178(2)
- Posts: 8558
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:12 pm
- Location: Ben Phelps is an alleged scammer
Re: Lz9 rotating assembly weights
So the big end would need to be narrowed like a typical SBC rod when converting to our engines as the LS engines have a similar rod width to the old sbc rod
It seems that the coating comes off the rods at the big end, since that's where the rods in a stock V8 application share a rod journal, so they can rub on each other. This isn't an issue with the v6 crank. I haven't looked to see if recoating is still possible but I know it was offered at one time. I am sure it is still around however because aftermarket companies are still making Ti rods, so those would have to be coated when new.
Cutting the crank would change the necessary compression height needed for the piston. So perhaps off the shelf pistons wouldn't work any longer making custom ones necessary which would then add a cost that would prob make a build not worth it financially. Also I would worry about the crank strength being compromised.
It seems that the coating comes off the rods at the big end, since that's where the rods in a stock V8 application share a rod journal, so they can rub on each other. This isn't an issue with the v6 crank. I haven't looked to see if recoating is still possible but I know it was offered at one time. I am sure it is still around however because aftermarket companies are still making Ti rods, so those would have to be coated when new.
Cutting the crank would change the necessary compression height needed for the piston. So perhaps off the shelf pistons wouldn't work any longer making custom ones necessary which would then add a cost that would prob make a build not worth it financially. Also I would worry about the crank strength being compromised.
FieroPhrek working on that ls4 swap for 18 years and counting now. 18 years!!!!! LOL
BEWARE OF BEN PHELPS. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED. WORSE THAN MILZY IMO
BEWARE OF BEN PHELPS. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED. WORSE THAN MILZY IMO
-
- Peer Mediator
- Posts: 15679
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 11:13 pm
- Location: In the darkness, where fear and knowing are one
- Contact:
Re: Lz9 rotating assembly weights
Titanium rods are slowly becoming more common; the technology is definitely proliferating. I haven't looked into having titanium recoated.Shaun41178(2) wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2023 11:28 am So the big end would need to be narrowed like a typical SBC rod when converting to our engines as the LS engines have a similar rod width to the old sbc rod
It seems that the coating comes off the rods at the big end, since that's where the rods in a stock V8 application share a rod journal, so they can rub on each other. This isn't an issue with the v6 crank. I haven't looked to see if recoating is still possible but I know it was offered at one time. I am sure it is still around however because aftermarket companies are still making Ti rods, so those would have to be coated when new.
What's the rod end clearance in the V6? The cheeks of the crank throw do rub on the sides of the rods, although the oil that's squeezed out of the bearing lubricates the sides of the rods.
Cutting (grinding) the crank would not change the piston compression height. Offset grinding the crank like Upson did would change the required piston compression height.Shaun41178(2) wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2023 11:28 am Cutting the crank would change the necessary compression height needed for the piston. So perhaps off the shelf pistons wouldn't work any longer making custom ones necessary which would then add a cost that would prob make a build not worth it financially. Also I would worry about the crank strength being compromised.
I guess Ti rods for a 4.3 V6 would be too expensive as there are no factory take-outs to snag used. Don't the LZ4/9 use the same size rod journals as the old 4.3's? (Do the LT based 4.3's use the same journal size, for that matter?)
- Shaun41178(2)
- Posts: 8558
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:12 pm
- Location: Ben Phelps is an alleged scammer
Re: Lz9 rotating assembly weights
Don't know about the old 4.3s. They were essentially a SBC with 2 cylinders cut off. The newer lt 4.3 I have no familiarity at this time but suppose I could research but there are no Ti rods from gm for that engine.The Dark Side of Will wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2023 12:30 pm
Cutting (grinding) the crank would not change the piston compression height. Offset grinding the crank like Upson did would change the required piston compression height.
I guess Ti rods for a 4.3 V6 would be too expensive as there are no factory take-outs to snag used. Don't the LZ4/9 use the same size rod journals as the old 4.3's? (Do the LT based 4.3's use the same journal size, for that matter?)
Your right about the crank. Only if I was offset grinding.
So the lz rod big end is 2.374 diameter according to Pauter. Gm lists the ls7 rod as a 2.225.
The lz9 crank has the journal for the rod listed at 2.248-2.249
The ls7 rod journal is listed as 2.100
-
- Peer Mediator
- Posts: 15679
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 11:13 pm
- Location: In the darkness, where fear and knowing are one
- Contact:
Re: Lz9 rotating assembly weights
The SBC started off with 2.000" rod journals, then went to 2.100" rod journals.
The 4.3 at some point (IIRC) had 2.250" journals to help with crankshaft stiffness because it had split crank throws. IIRC, the 4.3 started off odd-fire, then later GM split the journals to make it even-fire. Keeping crankshaft stiffness high enough with split journals required upsizing the journal diameter.
The earliest V6/60's had something smaller than 2", then upsized to 2.000" for most of the production run. Obvi that's why they can use small journal SBC rods.
As you noted, the LZ4/9 have ~2.250" journals. This *should* allow them to use 4.3 V6 rods narrowed the same way SBC rods are narrowed. I *think* someone on Pfiffle at least mentioned this possibility, if not outright doing the build. I want to say it was a 3.4 TDC with LZ9 crank (Does the LX9 have 2.000 or 2.250 journals?), but it's a vague memory.
Also note what piston pin diameter you're designing around... 1.100 is an extremely short compression height, and you may (probably will) run the oil rings into the pin bores. Pin diameter affects the degree to which this happens.
Unrelated:
The Northstar has 54mm rod journals, but slightly thinner bearings than SBCs run. The Northstar rod BE bore is 2.226 vs SBC 2.225. So with narrowing, re-keying and maybe a slight hone, a Northstar can also use SBC rods.
The 4.3 at some point (IIRC) had 2.250" journals to help with crankshaft stiffness because it had split crank throws. IIRC, the 4.3 started off odd-fire, then later GM split the journals to make it even-fire. Keeping crankshaft stiffness high enough with split journals required upsizing the journal diameter.
The earliest V6/60's had something smaller than 2", then upsized to 2.000" for most of the production run. Obvi that's why they can use small journal SBC rods.
As you noted, the LZ4/9 have ~2.250" journals. This *should* allow them to use 4.3 V6 rods narrowed the same way SBC rods are narrowed. I *think* someone on Pfiffle at least mentioned this possibility, if not outright doing the build. I want to say it was a 3.4 TDC with LZ9 crank (Does the LX9 have 2.000 or 2.250 journals?), but it's a vague memory.
Also note what piston pin diameter you're designing around... 1.100 is an extremely short compression height, and you may (probably will) run the oil rings into the pin bores. Pin diameter affects the degree to which this happens.
Unrelated:
The Northstar has 54mm rod journals, but slightly thinner bearings than SBCs run. The Northstar rod BE bore is 2.226 vs SBC 2.225. So with narrowing, re-keying and maybe a slight hone, a Northstar can also use SBC rods.