Sooooo..... what do the quickest PR 60*'s run?
Moderator: Series8217
-
- Posts: 798
- Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 10:08 pm
- Location: Minnesota
- Contact:
- Shaun41178(2)
- Posts: 8587
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:12 pm
- Location: Ben Phelps is an alleged scammer
-
- Posts: 798
- Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 10:08 pm
- Location: Minnesota
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 623
- Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 11:30 am
Aaron wrote:He doesn't have the cash, that's why he's stuck in a 20 year old econo-box. Notice everyone who has the cash has moved up? What do you drive? Trevor? Donk?crzyone wrote:You are so hung up on money. If he has the cash and would rather someone else build it then that is his choice. Cost doesn't matter to some people.
He got what he wanted, what he paid for. Doesn't matter if you think it's too expensive. Maybe someday when you have a house, a job and a life you won't find the time to work on your stuff either. $7k isn't exactly a lot of money anyways.
.
your a fuckin Idiot , peoples financial position has little to do with their tastes.
U would think a kid who claims to have a 996 TT and a POS Camaro would understand that.
Fuck you Shaun , one day those little boys will talk and when they do you will get yours.
-
- Posts: 2908
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 2:47 pm
- Location: Columbus, Ohio
I'll be interested to see what your car runs Chris, you have one of the most modified 60* n/a's out there that I know of. I really think you should go with a 282, 284, or 287 and call it a day. At least something manual, a 4 speed actually would probably be faster if its the right gearing. 4T65-E is a lot of time and money when a stick would be faster. Do you have a TH-125 in it right now?
-
- Posts: 469
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 11:08 am
Shaun41178(2) wrote:I wouldnt' get yoru hopes up too high. That autot ranny is going to kill you. I might see a 14.5 in your future but thats probably it on the motor.
If you do spray it, you might hit mid to low 13's pending on the size kit you use at probably around 100 mph or so. Quick for a v6 fiero
why is the auto tranny a bad thing? it'd need a shift kit for sure but, brake-boosting and staying in boost between shifts sounds like quite an advantage. not to mention, its almost always easier to launch an auto
-
- Posts: 2908
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 2:47 pm
- Location: Columbus, Ohio
look at the stock from the factory 1/4 mile times - almost a FULL SECOND between the auto & the 4-speedHonest Don wrote:why is the auto tranny a bad thing? it'd need a shift kit for sure but, brake-boosting and staying in boost between shifts sounds like quite an advantage. not to mention, its almost always easier to launch an auto
-
- Peer Mediator
- Posts: 15710
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 11:13 pm
- Location: In the darkness, where fear and knowing are one
- Contact:
That's a combination of weight, parasitic loss and tuning. I've only driven an auto Fiero once or twice YEARS ago, so I don't recall how well they work, but my 6000 AWD shifts pretty well. The 125's were GM's last bulletproof transmission. They're calibrated so that at stock output they'll last forever, even when the driver has his foot in the throttle body all the time. My 6000 has 1/4 M miles on it...
-
- Posts: 469
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 11:08 am
Pyrthian wrote:look at the stock from the factory 1/4 mile times - almost a FULL SECOND between the auto & the 4-speedHonest Don wrote:why is the auto tranny a bad thing? it'd need a shift kit for sure but, brake-boosting and staying in boost between shifts sounds like quite an advantage. not to mention, its almost always easier to launch an auto
get a shift kit and learn how to stall one up...
Haven't you ever wanted more power out of your 6000? Having driven a 3.1/3-speed Beretta, I can only imagine the hell that would be adding 600-1000 lbs to that.
I bet a 5-speed, AWD 6000 with a mildly modded TGP motor (260hp or so) would be pretty wicked to drive. Torque on demand, and the traction to hold it down. I know a TGP 5-speed, even at just 195whp, was quite a trip to drive.
However, after driving a FWD W-body plenty in the snow, I am perfectly happy with the FWD. I wouldn't mind the AWD, but being down so much on power would make it much less fun to drive all around, and I really like having the 225hp DOHC powertrain. Though with the newer cars getting faster and faster, a 60hp or so bump would be greatly appreciated.
I bet a 5-speed, AWD 6000 with a mildly modded TGP motor (260hp or so) would be pretty wicked to drive. Torque on demand, and the traction to hold it down. I know a TGP 5-speed, even at just 195whp, was quite a trip to drive.
However, after driving a FWD W-body plenty in the snow, I am perfectly happy with the FWD. I wouldn't mind the AWD, but being down so much on power would make it much less fun to drive all around, and I really like having the 225hp DOHC powertrain. Though with the newer cars getting faster and faster, a 60hp or so bump would be greatly appreciated.
88GT 3.4 DOHC Turbo
Gooch wrote:Way to go douche. You are like a one-man, fiero-destroying machine.
-
- Peer Mediator
- Posts: 15710
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 11:13 pm
- Location: In the darkness, where fear and knowing are one
- Contact:
-
- Peer Mediator
- Posts: 15710
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 11:13 pm
- Location: In the darkness, where fear and knowing are one
- Contact:
There was a FWD 6000 STE 5 speed on eBay a few months ago... it looked like it was in REALLY good shape too.
I've heard from McCreery that he knew of a guy who got FTD pretty regularly in a modded 6000... :afrocool:
Why does ANYTHING need more power? :thumbleft:
Also, modding the 6000 to a modest level is turning out to be stoopidly easy. Fiero rear Konis work on the front. Minivan front springs increase the spring rate from 85 ppi to 110 ppi. 16x8 Grand Prix wheels bolt right on to the front and 16x7 Bonneville wheels bolt right on to the back (w/ 1/4" wheel spacers to clear the AWD toe links). In terms of improvement for the buck I've never seen anything better. Probably out-handles a lot of Fieros in that condition.
I can also use Fiero cradle and control arm poly bushings (or control arm roller bearings :scratch: ) all around, and those are on my list. With the rear air suspension, I can build a 6" turn buckle to adjust the link to the ride height switch and set the ride height wherever I want. I can install a solenoid valve between the two air struts to radically increase rear roll stiffness.
Since it's a 60 degree v6, I could go all the way to a 3900 pretty easily, although I do have to give some respect to the fact that it's a TH125. I was thinking a turbo 3100 w/ built transmission and 38/32 chain ratio (over 100 mph in 2nd gear at 6500 RPM).
I've heard from McCreery that he knew of a guy who got FTD pretty regularly in a modded 6000... :afrocool:
Why does ANYTHING need more power? :thumbleft:
Also, modding the 6000 to a modest level is turning out to be stoopidly easy. Fiero rear Konis work on the front. Minivan front springs increase the spring rate from 85 ppi to 110 ppi. 16x8 Grand Prix wheels bolt right on to the front and 16x7 Bonneville wheels bolt right on to the back (w/ 1/4" wheel spacers to clear the AWD toe links). In terms of improvement for the buck I've never seen anything better. Probably out-handles a lot of Fieros in that condition.
I can also use Fiero cradle and control arm poly bushings (or control arm roller bearings :scratch: ) all around, and those are on my list. With the rear air suspension, I can build a 6" turn buckle to adjust the link to the ride height switch and set the ride height wherever I want. I can install a solenoid valve between the two air struts to radically increase rear roll stiffness.
Since it's a 60 degree v6, I could go all the way to a 3900 pretty easily, although I do have to give some respect to the fact that it's a TH125. I was thinking a turbo 3100 w/ built transmission and 38/32 chain ratio (over 100 mph in 2nd gear at 6500 RPM).
Over 100mph in 2nd? Ouch. The 3900 better be making 550-600hp to make use of that.The Dark Side of Will wrote: Since it's a 60 degree v6, I could go all the way to a 3900 pretty easily, although I do have to give some respect to the fact that it's a TH125. I was thinking a turbo 3100 w/ built transmission and 38/32 chain ratio (over 100 mph in 2nd gear at 6500 RPM).
-
- Posts: 623
- Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 11:30 am
The Dark Side of Will wrote:There was a FWD 6000 STE 5 speed on eBay a few months ago... it looked like it was in REALLY good shape too.
I've heard from McCreery that he knew of a guy who got FTD pretty regularly in a modded 6000... :afrocool:
Why does ANYTHING need more power? :thumbleft:
Also, modding the 6000 to a modest level is turning out to be stoopidly easy. Fiero rear Konis work on the front. Minivan front springs increase the spring rate from 85 ppi to 110 ppi. 16x8 Grand Prix wheels bolt right on to the front and 16x7 Bonneville wheels bolt right on to the back (w/ 1/4" wheel spacers to clear the AWD toe links). In terms of improvement for the buck I've never seen anything better. Probably out-handles a lot of Fieros in that condition.
I can also use Fiero cradle and control arm poly bushings (or control arm roller bearings :scratch: ) all around, and those are on my list. With the rear air suspension, I can build a 6" turn buckle to adjust the link to the ride height switch and set the ride height wherever I want. I can install a solenoid valve between the two air struts to radically increase rear roll stiffness.
Since it's a 60 degree v6, I could go all the way to a 3900 pretty easily, although I do have to give some respect to the fact that it's a TH125. I was thinking a turbo 3100 w/ built transmission and 38/32 chain ratio (over 100 mph in 2nd gear at 6500 RPM).
That car was nuts , I am glad he stopped coming out , I felt like a douche canoe..more so than normal
Fuck you Shaun , one day those little boys will talk and when they do you will get yours.