Dyno of my 88 Formula.
Moderator: Series8217
- Shaun41178(2)
- Posts: 8464
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:12 pm
- Location: Ben Phelps is an alleged scammer
Dyno of my 88 Formula.
This is a dyno of my 88 Formula.
This was the setup I was going to run Earl(he has a 4.9 swap) with but he pussed out. Prob better that he did too.
Test was in third gear. It does 190 whp hp in 4th gear but I dont' have a sheet for that.
Here:
This was the setup I was going to run Earl(he has a 4.9 swap) with but he pussed out. Prob better that he did too.
Test was in third gear. It does 190 whp hp in 4th gear but I dont' have a sheet for that.
Here:
FieroPhrek working on that ls4 swap for 18 years and counting now. 18 years!!!!! LOL
530 whp is greater than 312
530 whp is greater than 312
-
- Posts: 349
- Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 12:18 am
- Location: Michigan
-
- Posts: 623
- Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 11:30 am
-
- Posts: 623
- Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 11:30 am
-
- LT1 boy
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 8:39 pm
- Location: ATL
- Contact:
-
- Peer Mediator
- Posts: 15629
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 11:13 pm
- Location: In the darkness, where fear and knowing are one
- Contact:
Re: Dyno of my 88 Formula.
Don't often see a 2.8 curve that looks like that... no fall off at high RPM... nice.Shaun41178(2) wrote:This is a dyno of my 88 Formula.
This was the setup I was going to run Earl(he has a Peice of shit swap) with but he pussed out. Prob better that he did too.
Test was in third gear. It does 190 whp hp in 4th gear but I dont' have a sheet for that.
Here:
That sheet was on the bottle, right?
Do you have numbers for it off the bottle?
- Shaun41178(2)
- Posts: 8464
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:12 pm
- Location: Ben Phelps is an alleged scammer
yep those runs were on the bottle.
I have some off the bottle but I was running 19 lb injectors and lets just say that the readings are not an accurate representation of the power it makes off the juice. Its super rich and I lost 18 hp from the stock injectors with the 19 lbers peak but around 6k rpm i was down like 50 hp or something from the stock injectors. It was really bad.
I do have a graph of my car on the stock injectors but the tires are really out of balance and gave a bad reading on the dyno. the graph is really messed up and isn't worth displaying as once again its not an accurate representation. However on this graph the peak hp number was 110.
I have some off the bottle but I was running 19 lb injectors and lets just say that the readings are not an accurate representation of the power it makes off the juice. Its super rich and I lost 18 hp from the stock injectors with the 19 lbers peak but around 6k rpm i was down like 50 hp or something from the stock injectors. It was really bad.
I do have a graph of my car on the stock injectors but the tires are really out of balance and gave a bad reading on the dyno. the graph is really messed up and isn't worth displaying as once again its not an accurate representation. However on this graph the peak hp number was 110.
FieroPhrek working on that ls4 swap for 18 years and counting now. 18 years!!!!! LOL
530 whp is greater than 312
530 whp is greater than 312
That's your peak hp number with the Starship Enterprise intake? That seems low. I've dynoed some stock Fiero 2.8s and they've been around 115 hp peak.Shaun41178(2) wrote:yep those runs were on the bottle.However on this graph the peak hp number was 110.
I assume this number was affected by your out of balance tires?
2.8
- Shaun41178(2)
- Posts: 8464
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:12 pm
- Location: Ben Phelps is an alleged scammer
the whole run was messed up cause of the tires.
yea peak numbers dont' mean much really. its the powerband.
This intake might not make anymore peak power then stock but take a reading at 6k rpm over a stock intake and there are gains. Look at most 2.8 dyno numbers. The tq curve starts to fall at around 3700 rpm, and the hp starts to fall around 5k or so and once it falls it falls hard. I dotn' start to lose tq till 5k rpm! When racing that extra tq is huge to maintain it that high in the rpm band. I lose 5 hp from 5k rpm to 6k rpm. Only 5!. Stock intake 2.8's dont' do that. Mind you I am on a stock cam that is designed for 1k-4500 rpm range for making power. With a cam designed for more top end, like a 260 or 272 then it would be insane. It would prob keep climbing all the way till 6k rpm.
Peak numbers dont' mean shit.
unfortunately I dont' have a good run to compare to a fairly stock 2.8.
I have old dyno charts of my old 85 Gt auto with nitrous on it. The tq curve on that car did nothing but go down from the time the run started till the time the run ended. Horrible!
yea peak numbers dont' mean much really. its the powerband.
This intake might not make anymore peak power then stock but take a reading at 6k rpm over a stock intake and there are gains. Look at most 2.8 dyno numbers. The tq curve starts to fall at around 3700 rpm, and the hp starts to fall around 5k or so and once it falls it falls hard. I dotn' start to lose tq till 5k rpm! When racing that extra tq is huge to maintain it that high in the rpm band. I lose 5 hp from 5k rpm to 6k rpm. Only 5!. Stock intake 2.8's dont' do that. Mind you I am on a stock cam that is designed for 1k-4500 rpm range for making power. With a cam designed for more top end, like a 260 or 272 then it would be insane. It would prob keep climbing all the way till 6k rpm.
Peak numbers dont' mean shit.
unfortunately I dont' have a good run to compare to a fairly stock 2.8.
I have old dyno charts of my old 85 Gt auto with nitrous on it. The tq curve on that car did nothing but go down from the time the run started till the time the run ended. Horrible!
FieroPhrek working on that ls4 swap for 18 years and counting now. 18 years!!!!! LOL
530 whp is greater than 312
530 whp is greater than 312
-
- its just for decorations
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 1:11 pm
- Location: On the toilet.
- Contact:
- Shaun41178(2)
- Posts: 8464
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:12 pm
- Location: Ben Phelps is an alleged scammer