GM revised the 3800 Series II lower intake gaskets AGAIN!

Real tech discussion on design, fabrication, testing, development of custom or adapted parts for Pontiac Fieros. Not questions about the power a CAI will give.

Moderators: The Dark Side of Will, Series8217

Post Reply
Sinister Fiero
Posts: 665
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 12:10 pm
Location: Waterloo, Indiana
Contact:

GM revised the 3800 Series II lower intake gaskets AGAIN!

Post by Sinister Fiero »

This latest design revision is exactly what they should have done in the first place...

GM part# 89017825

Image

The new gasket uses an aluminum shell (instead of plastic) with the sealing agent embossed into it. The older designs always had a problem with cracking around the coolant ports which allowed coolant to get past the sealing agent and creep into the lifter valley / oiling system.

Here are some examples of older designs:

Image

This picture illustrates the previous two designs. There was yet another previous design not shown here. In the first design, no metal rings were located around the intake manifold bolt holes. What was happening most of the time was people were overtightening the intake manifold causing the plastic shell to crack. The top gasket in the last picture shows a later design where GM attempted to fix this problem by putting metal rings on the outer bolt holes. The last design (bottom gasket) had rings around all bolt holes plus the sealing agent and shell materials were upgraded to higher temperature materials. Appearantly GM discovered this wasn't enough so they redesigned the gasket to use an aluminum frame (latest design).
OVERKILL IS UNDERRATED
Image
Custom GM OBD1 & OBD2 Tuning | Engine Conversions | www.gmtuners.com
Fast88Fiero
Posts: 349
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 12:18 am
Location: Michigan

Post by Fast88Fiero »

Yep, I did a set at work a couple days ago and was shocked when I got the new gaskets! Finally I think they fixed the problems. About damn time! :thumbleft:
88 coupe: 2.0 turbo 4. T25, w2a, meth injection
Image
Post Reply