Kohburn wrote:(do you actually post anything fiero related? or just look for forums to post about politics on? there are political forums you can go to if thats what your hobby is)
A- can't believe you ranked clinton with fdr - Clinton ignored a lot of issues with other countries that has helped cause much of what bush has had to deal with - yes i think bush could have dealt better - but i really don't think kerry could have at all so I'm happy with my vote,
1. I think more states should execute - maybe people would be less inclined to do it
2. already discussed my taxation opinion
3. oh is it really? vacationed yes - secretive? thanks to the growth of america media and computer dependancy i think the gov't has less opportunity to be secretive - and without a cold war less need
4. can't compare job losses under bush to clinton or any of the other peacetime presidents
5. not familiar with that particular bill
6. was very much against that bill - but knew it'd never pass
7. never heard about that one.. reducing arsenic is good - but depends on what the method of doing so was int he bill.. some things just aren't practical
but seriously - is your entire point to whine about bush? or talk about how to actually improve the government?
(do you actually post anything fiero related? or just look for forums to post about politics on? there are political forums you can go to if thats what your hobby is)
Am I pissing in your punch? If you thought you had a foothold of a chance in establishing an argument you would welcome my presence. So questioning presence/attendeance in what follows targeting and misdirection??? Topic: So the chimp will just pass along the missery to the old
A- can't believe you ranked clinton with fdr - Clinton ignored a lot of issues with other countries that has helped cause much of what bush has had to deal with
See, here’s your timeto shine and you peter-out. Clinton caused much of what Bush has to deal with
BECAUSE…..
Be comprehensive by referring to at least the establishment of Israel and then include the Gulf War, etc… then why Clinton failed to do whatever you think he failed to do. Clinton was like FDR in regard to his social programs. Clinton will never be an FDR, but he was positive for the country in so many ways. People were happier, more prosperous and the feds had an annual surplus, yet the Repubs bitched; why?
yes i think bush could have dealt better
BECAUSE…….. Come on, tell us why in3 words or more - joking, tell us why, I want to read.
but i really don't think kerry could have at all so I'm happy with my vote,
BECAUSE….. What is it about Kerry’s record, etc that would have made him a poorer decider? You guys can’t wave in Gore’s face the fact that Bush had military service, then hide it like little bitches during the Kerry debates. You guys can’t state that Kerry voted for the invasion, then call him an idiot for doing what Bush did. DO you guys ever read your won rhetoric?
1. I think more states should execute - maybe people would be less inclined to do it
If you wish I will do research for what you are clumsily trying to state; executions lead to deterrence. It simply isn’t true on a state, federal or world level. Before I reaserch I need you to turn your one-liners into at least 4-liners.
2. already discussed my taxation opinion
You wrote:
well if you want to get into taxes and spending I belive we'd be much better off with a flat income tax or a flat sales tax inplace of income tax - (of course then people would jsut buy everything overseas unless we had hefty import taxes)
the rich are the bigest spenders so obviously they'd pay out the most
if food was still tax free then the poor would obviously pay the least since they can't afford the extra luxeries that are heavy taxed..
plus it mades the irs's job a lot more simple
OK, you are talking collections versus expenditures. I guess this is in response to me saying chimp isn’t going to raise taxes on his rich friends, but to cancel/delay medical benefits for the elderly/poor. You’re transposing simplicity for the IRS to justify cutting expenditures that are necessary. If your kid needs an operation now, you aren’t going to wait until next year when you can afford it, you will go into debt or find anther way to et he money.
I merely referred to the tax breaks going to the rich, you dodged it again by referring to a past argument that doesn’t apply.
3. oh is it really? vacationed yes - secretive? thanks to the growth of america media and computer dependancy i think the gov't has less opportunity to be secretive - and without a cold war less need
God you are an uninformed anus. Secrecy in that he has few public addresses to the nation, and that he suppresses documents and events. Not to mention organizations like the TSA where chimp can classify entire cases as secretive denying due process. Computer dependency? OK, that has zero to do with how chimp runs the gov as much out of the public eye as possible. W/o a Cold War? WTF does that have to do with anything? In case you have pulled your head out of the sand long enough to see, the US continually insights wars against something or someone.
1. War on Communism (Cold War)
2. War on drugs
3. War on terrorism
We are always fighting an entity or a substance or something, whether it needs fighting or not.
4. can't compare job losses under bush to clinton or any of the other peacetime presidents
You can when chimp’s policies are so pro-corporate that he makes it impossible for the poor to survive. In fact, many times in the past jobs have been more abundant in times of war. The war has little to do with things, but assignment of funding to programs has a lot to do with these things.
The Great Depression makes 9/11 look like nothing and FDR pulled the US out of it, it being Hoover’s nightmare.
5. not familiar with that particular bill
The Ergonomics Bill. Clinton and OSHA originated this bill to aide in fast track format help to workers who working repetitive motion fields and get carpel tunnel, etc… Bush whacked after it passed Congress, saying it wasn’t good for employers. True, it’s bad for employers / good for people; wonder which way chimp leans?
6. was very much against that bill - but knew it'd never pass
No, no my chimp-loving friend, it was finally shoved thru Congress by the chimp in question. This illustrates how politically aware you are, but you’ll defend the chimp till the end of time….. Genius.
7. never heard about that one.. reducing arsenic is good - but depends on what the method of doing so was int he bill.. some things just aren't practical
Practicality before health - the Repug mantra. Clinton had the it going and he killed it when it came before him; see how stupid Bush voters are? First, they usually aren’t aware, then when they learn the truth they make excuses and talk about Clinton’s womanizing.
but seriously - is your entire point to whine about bush? or talk about how to actually improve the government?
And that’s the Bush agenda; let’s not look to see who’s to blame, but let’s just look to repair. Well, let’s repair by not voting in Nazi’s with corporate love and hate/disregard for the poor. In a representative Democracy we make changes by voting out the Nazi fuckers like Bush and voting in anyone else, preferably a positive model.
.