![Image](http://i1201.photobucket.com/albums/bb346/r0nnj0nn/P01-20-12_14121.jpg)
![Image](http://i1201.photobucket.com/albums/bb346/r0nnj0nn/P01-20-12_1412.jpg)
Moderator: crzyone
Betcha he wasn't using any sway-control, nor any WD. He needed both.Series8217 wrote:What about this? http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xjg3b9 ... -fail_auto
The stroker crank, plus the K-B pistons, plus buying a 305, plus gaskets, plus balancing...The Dark Side of Will wrote:331... 305 block with 383 crank. The small bore and long stroke give a better surface area/volume ratio for the cylinder than a 327. This means (slightly) less waste heat, slightly better gas mileage.
Talk to a man called dieselolds on www.dieselplace.comCincinnatiFiero wrote:Do an early GM diesel, I'd be interested to see you prove will and I wrong. If you think you can get adequate power and mpg out of the 4.3 diesel. I've never seen anyone try to make one work I've only ever seen them end in tears. If you can really get 40mpg out of a $75 motor id be impressed. I wouldn't mind being proved wrong, however "in theory" isn't adequate.