Blue Shift wrote:Oh yeah, I forgot about EBSB52.
Dude, if I were smoking as much base as you are, perhaps I would feel compelled to sit and study politics for 7 hours straight so I could feel self worth by insulting _____ political party too. Gotta sport yo mad research skillz on RTF, yo. Democratz in da house fo shizzle, Biii-yooootch! :afrocool:
It looks like you have halfway decent research skills and plenty of patience and time. You still let your ignorance shine through though. But wait! I thought Democrats aren't ignorant, that's what Republicans are for? I guess you're nothing but a long haired, drug using, freeloading hippie. D-d-dammit boy! I-I reckin I'm gonna have to git outta my John Deere tractor with my beatin' stick and give y'all a whippin you ain't never forget, ya hear?!
Seriously. Now I'm glad I didn't waste my time looking up the facts to argue with you... :stfu:
Instead of admiring my research skills, refute them. See, in science, they print peer-reviewed journals so that they can be proven wrong. In the religious scene, which is often parallel with the GOP's protocol, they have the doctrine, just need sheep to follow.
I beg you, refute the claims I make. Start with the Patterson claims I have refuted. Look at this entire thread and pick apart SUBSTANTIVE points. If I call you a dickhead, it's because I think you are, but it has no SUBSTANTIVE merit other than my opinion, which is generally worthless like anyone else's. I implore you to scientifically refute my claims or make some of your own and let me attempt to refute/reject them if I see fit.
You still let your ignorance shine through though.
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=ignorance
IGNORANCE:
-The condition of being uneducated, unaware, or uninformed.
-the lack of knowledge or education
OK, so I have mad research skills, but then I am uneducated, unaware, or uninformed; can you make sense. I realize that calling me ignorant is your pathetic way of saying you disagree with my opinions, but this isn't about me or you, it's about the merit of the issues/arguments - refute them not me.
I guess you're nothing but a long haired, drug using, freeloading hippie.
Actually a balding, anti-drug (not even caffeine), hard worker. This isn't about you or me, unless you are unable to garner a cogent argument, then you are the typical jackass who relies upon:
Ad Hominem:
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=Ad%20Hominem
-Appealing to personal considerations rather than to logic or reason: Debaters should avoid ad hominem arguments that question their opponents' motives.
-appealing to personal considerations (rather than to fact or reason); "ad hominem arguments"
This is a personal attack as a way of arguing an issue. Again, I have no problems with personal attacks - I think they're fun, but to center your argument an opinion, or even a fact that a person is a no good son-of-a-bitch is a way of avoiding the argument. I'm not saying I'm perfect and don't do it myself, but when I catch myself I back off. SO go and read my long threads and find the key issues. or I will repost them, or continue to call me ignorant while committing the most ignorant act of all, Ad Hominem.
I-I reckin I'm gonna have to git outta my John Deere tractor with my beatin' stick and give y'all a whippin you ain't never forget, ya hear?!
Good luck small man.
Seriously. Now I'm glad I didn't waste my time looking up the facts to argue with you...
That should be the Repug mantra.... after all, they appeal to emotion, not intellect. Do you think being cute is going to appeal to anyone here, except your fellow Repugs? You have no argument, we see that....