9.11 Conpiracy Probability... The Actual Article... SCIENCE!
Moderator: ericjon262
9.11 Conpiracy Probability... The Actual Article... SCIENCE!
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html
Your concerned leader
Diggity"Argue the facts... not your dumb ass fucking opinion"Biggity
Your concerned leader
Diggity"Argue the facts... not your dumb ass fucking opinion"Biggity
Bla bla bla....Here, let me demonstrate.
"In addition, the timing between the puffs is less than 0.2 seconds so air-expulsion due to collapsing floors is excluded. Free-fall time for a floor to fall down to the next floor is significantly longer than 0.2 seconds: the equation for free fall, y = ½ gt2, yields a little over 0.6 seconds, as this is near the initiation of the collapse."
The first floor that collapsed would be the only one that would be a free fall. All the floors after that would have accelerated at an abnormal rate due to the velocity of the falling floor impacting it.
From one of the sources he quoted...
" 'As of 21 days after the attack, the fires were still burning and molten steel was still running.' "
So the bombs kept going off for 21 days? :scratch:
Your brilliant scientist is a moron. I apologize in advance for having no arguement and falling back to name-calling, since I'm an uneducated neanderthal. Still, he's a moron.
I think I'm done in this forum.
"In addition, the timing between the puffs is less than 0.2 seconds so air-expulsion due to collapsing floors is excluded. Free-fall time for a floor to fall down to the next floor is significantly longer than 0.2 seconds: the equation for free fall, y = ½ gt2, yields a little over 0.6 seconds, as this is near the initiation of the collapse."
The first floor that collapsed would be the only one that would be a free fall. All the floors after that would have accelerated at an abnormal rate due to the velocity of the falling floor impacting it.
From one of the sources he quoted...
" 'As of 21 days after the attack, the fires were still burning and molten steel was still running.' "
So the bombs kept going off for 21 days? :scratch:
Your brilliant scientist is a moron. I apologize in advance for having no arguement and falling back to name-calling, since I'm an uneducated neanderthal. Still, he's a moron.
I think I'm done in this forum.
Indy DOHC Turbo SD4.....someday.
Oh, and f*ck the envelope. (RFT Insurgent)
Oh, and f*ck the envelope. (RFT Insurgent)
-
- Peer Mediator
- Posts: 15629
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 11:13 pm
- Location: In the darkness, where fear and knowing are one
- Contact:
Uhmm, no... how can their be molten metal 70 feet below the surface 21 days after the building fell when NO OXYGEN is present... Jet fule doesn't burn hot enough to cause this... Thermite however does.... and since molten metal was found under BOTH the WTC and Building 7, proves it WASN'T! jet fule...Indy wrote:acting it.
From one of the sources he quoted...
" 'As of 21 days after the attack, the fires were still burning and molten steel was still running.' "
So the bombs kept going off for 21 days? :scratch:
Your brilliant scientist is a moron. I apologize in advance for having no arguement and falling back to name-calling, since I'm an uneducated neanderthal. Still, he's a moron.
I think I'm done in this forum.
Your concerned leader
Diggity"Let's not believe science"Biggity
- Series8217
- 1988 Fiero Track Car
- Posts: 5989
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 9:47 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
hmm so since you think there was no oxygen present at the bottom of a heaping pile of stuff that was on fire.. then the thick pile of ass at the bottom of a campfire where the coals are the hottest part of the fire must also not gete oxygen?..
seriously - as a pyro much of this talk is just silly - I can melt metal in a campfire fueled by nothing but pine needles - pressboard furnature and plastics contain vastly more energy when burned and can generate higher temperatures - confined spaces like a rock ring (colapes concrete) only serve to concentrate the heat into one place - thus increasing the temperatures in the area and turn it into a furnace - not to mention that metals also burn when they get hot enough
(thermite is basicly just iron oxide powder and aluminum powder mixed thoroughly and often lit with a magnesium fuse)
seriously - as a pyro much of this talk is just silly - I can melt metal in a campfire fueled by nothing but pine needles - pressboard furnature and plastics contain vastly more energy when burned and can generate higher temperatures - confined spaces like a rock ring (colapes concrete) only serve to concentrate the heat into one place - thus increasing the temperatures in the area and turn it into a furnace - not to mention that metals also burn when they get hot enough
(thermite is basicly just iron oxide powder and aluminum powder mixed thoroughly and often lit with a magnesium fuse)
The coles in a fire have oxygen... if you throw dirt on a fire.. you put it out.Kohburn wrote:hmm so since you think there was no oxygen present at the bottom of a heaping pile of stuff that was on fire.. then the thick pile of ass at the bottom of a campfire where the coals are the hottest part of the fire must also not gete oxygen?..
seriously - as a pyro much of this talk is just silly - I can melt metal in a campfire fueled by nothing but pine needles - pressboard furnature and plastics contain vastly more energy when burned and can generate higher temperatures - confined spaces like a rock ring (colapes concrete) only serve to concentrate the heat into one place - thus increasing the temperatures in the area and turn it into a furnace - not to mention that metals also burn when they get hot enough
(thermite is basicly just iron oxide powder and aluminum powder mixed thoroughly and often lit with a magnesium fuse)
Your concerned leader
Diggity"Without oxygen, you get no fire"Biggity
your logic is flawed - so if i throw dirt on some metal it won't rust because no oxygen can get to it?DiggityBiggity wrote: The coles in a fire have oxygen... if you throw dirt on a fire.. you put it out.
Your concerned leader
Diggity"Without oxygen, you get no fire"Biggity
smothering a fire that is burning something other than just leaves or twigs that would quickly burn themselves out anyways, so that it can not relite and is no longer smoldering takes mroe just just some dirt
We're talking about more than just dirt however... we're talking about 70 feet of concrete and steel... Why would the metal be MOLTEN?Kohburn wrote:your logic is flawed - so if i throw dirt on some metal it won't rust because no oxygen can get to it?DiggityBiggity wrote: The coles in a fire have oxygen... if you throw dirt on a fire.. you put it out.
Your concerned leader
Diggity"Without oxygen, you get no fire"Biggity
smothering a fire that is burning something other than just leaves or twigs that would quickly burn themselves out anyways, so that it can not relite and is no longer smoldering takes mroe just just some dirt
This is not MY logic.. this is a Prof. Of Physics
Your concerned leader
Diggity"Ignoring intellectuals is one of the many steps towards fascism"Biggity
there are just as many intellectuals that say otherwise -DiggityBiggity wrote: Diggity"Ignoring intellectuals is one of the many steps towards fascism"Biggity
besides proffessors are usually the ones that weren't good enough at it to get a real job and have little or no real world experience, only laboratory work.
Koh"choosing which intellectuals to believe based on them supporting your side is like using statistics to prove something and is on par with propoganda wars"burn
- Series8217
- 1988 Fiero Track Car
- Posts: 5989
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 9:47 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
Apparently you're so high up on your soap box you can't see a joke.DiggityBiggity wrote:Once again, no 747 crashed into building 7Series8217 wrote:Maybe it was a thermite-powered 747 :argue:
Your concerned leader
Diggity"Read the paper, before you start arguing with FACT"Biggity
Besides, the article you posted doesnt just talk about building 7. Read the paper before you start arguing
![Razz :-P](./images/smilies/tease.gif)
-
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:13 am
- Location: Block Shaun41178(2)
.
Last edited by SappySE107 on Mon Jun 12, 2023 5:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ben Phelps
60Degreev6.com
WOT-Tech.com
60Degreev6.com
WOT-Tech.com
Hehehehe...Nice.SappySE107 wrote:Good thing aarons head wasn't in there....it would still be burning.
Hey, how much rod stretch do y'all think I should account for when ordering my pistons?
Nate"smarter than a physicist, dumber than a wall"Engel
Indy DOHC Turbo SD4.....someday.
Oh, and f*ck the envelope. (RFT Insurgent)
Oh, and f*ck the envelope. (RFT Insurgent)
Did you read the article? It does talk about Building 7.. also, as far as me not taking a joke.. I don't find this topic very funnySeries8217 wrote:Apparently you're so high up on your soap box you can't see a joke.DiggityBiggity wrote:Once again, no 747 crashed into building 7Series8217 wrote:Maybe it was a thermite-powered 747 :argue:
Your concerned leader
Diggity"Read the paper, before you start arguing with FACT"Biggity
Besides, the article you posted doesnt just talk about building 7. Read the paper before you start arguing
Your concerned leader
Diggity"Sorry it went over my head"Biggity
- crzyone
- JDM Power FTW
- Posts: 4654
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 12:40 am
- Location: Whitecourt, Alberta, Canada
Remember the whole kinetic energy debate we had a week or so ago? How come it was all of a sudden forgotten? The building could have colapsed with no fire and there still could have been molten steel.
And thermite doesn't burn slowly, it burns like gunpowder. If there was thermite, it would have burned off long ago. I know, I've made plenty. Just get some rust and shave some aluminum, mix and light. Burns right through steel, doesn't just melt it.
And thermite doesn't burn slowly, it burns like gunpowder. If there was thermite, it would have burned off long ago. I know, I've made plenty. Just get some rust and shave some aluminum, mix and light. Burns right through steel, doesn't just melt it.
- Series8217
- 1988 Fiero Track Car
- Posts: 5989
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 9:47 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
Diggity, as I mentioned it doesnt just talk about building 7. It also talks about 1 and 2, which by the way, planes crashed into.DiggityBiggity wrote:Did you read the article? It does talk about Building 7.. also, as far as me not taking a joke.. I don't find this topic very funnySeries8217 wrote:Apparently you're so high up on your soap box you can't see a joke.DiggityBiggity wrote:Once again, no 747 crashed into building 7Series8217 wrote:Maybe it was a thermite-powered 747 :argue:
Your concerned leader
Diggity"Read the paper, before you start arguing with FACT"Biggity
Besides, the article you posted doesnt just talk about building 7. Read the paper before you start arguing
Your concerned leader
Diggity"Sorry it went over my head"Biggity
What's "read the paper, before you start arguing with FACT" supposed to mean? I haven't argued with any facts here. Was that in reference the idea of a plane hitting building 7?