Page 1 of 2

Americans aint retarded... our president is

Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 3:28 am
by DiggityBiggity
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... =emaillink

Your concerned leader

Diggity"Watch our for another terror attack to rally support"Biggity

Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 10:16 am
by whipped
Wouldn't another terrorist attack just prove that he hasn't done anything?

Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 11:21 am
by DiggityBiggity
whipped wrote:Wouldn't another terrorist attack just prove that he hasn't done anything?
You would think so, but that's being logical... and since most people think he did a great job before and after 9.11, Brainwashed Americans are not logical

Your concerned leader

Diggity"New Pearl Harbor"Biggity

Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 7:32 pm
by The Dark Side of Will
whipped wrote:Wouldn't another terrorist attack just prove that he hasn't done anything?
If that's your point of view, then the current lack of terrorist attacks must show that he's done a lot.

Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 8:19 pm
by whipped
The Dark Side of Will wrote:
whipped wrote:Wouldn't another terrorist attack just prove that he hasn't done anything?
If that's your point of view, then the current lack of terrorist attacks must show that he's done a lot.
I was going to say something witty, but I guess the majority disapprove of the way he's handling the "war on terra" now... we're such a fickle bunch.

"Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bush is handling the U.S. campaign against terrorism?"

10/2001 92% approve 5% disapprove
11/2005 48% approve 51% disapprove

Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 4:15 pm
by DiggityBiggity
Fickle?? The difference in your polls is four years... we aren't fickle.... we've realized we were LIED to.

Your concerned leader

Diggity"Do you remember why we invaded Iraq in the first place?"Biggity

Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 4:20 pm
by GT86
DiggityBiggity wrote:Fickle?? The difference in your polls is four years... we aren't fickle.... we've realized we were LIED to.

Your concerned leader

Diggity"Do you remember why we invaded Iraq in the first place?"Biggity
Yes, it been four years.....since we've had a terrorist attack. Shortly after 9/11, we were all for the "war on terror". But people are fickle, and have a short attention span.

If there was another attack tomorrow, everyone would be gung-ho again, for a few months anyway.

Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 6:20 pm
by whipped
something has to blow up before the "war on terror" is going well, according to the public.

and no, I don't remember why the iraq war started... I think it was either terrorists, wmds, oil, or just because we can. Saddam hussein might be in there too, I forget.

Whi"the world would be a lot better if everyone were dead"pped.

:la:

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 5:47 am
by DiggityBiggity
It was started because Saddam was an "Imminent and Imediate" threat... both of which, were lies!

Your concerned leader

Diggity"Pull your head out your ass"Biggity

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 10:58 pm
by z.MacK
GW will kick terrorist ass into the stone age. We need a consertaive leader right now. Some liberal in the office would be too much of a big pussy.
A big set is what the US of A needs.

Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 2:30 am
by stimpy
z.MacK wrote:GW will kick terrorist ass into the stone age. We need a consertaive leader right now. Some liberal in the office would be too much of a big pussy.
A big set is what the US of A needs.
Well, we should find someone to elect that has a pair, huh?

Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 10:27 am
by DiggityBiggity
z.MacK wrote:GW will kick terrorist ass into the stone age. We need a consertaive leader right now. Some liberal in the office would be too much of a big pussy.
A big set is what the US of A needs.
Nazi

Your concerned leader

Diggity"Iraq did nothing to us"Biggity

Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 12:36 pm
by GT86
z.MacK wrote:GW will kick terrorist ass into the stone age. We need a consertaive leader right now. Some liberal in the office would be too much of a big pussy.
A big set is what the US of A needs.
Yeah, we do need a leader who has the balls to go after those who attack us. But a leader with balls AND the brains to go after the right people would be even better.

Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 2:31 pm
by stimpy
And someone with the balls to admit they fucked up on the pre war intelligence would be appropriate.

Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 4:18 pm
by GT86
stimpy wrote:And someone with the balls to admit they fucked up on the pre war intelligence would be appropriate.
That too...

Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 4:55 pm
by whipped
"I think the intelligy I get is darn good intelligence."

:salute:

Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 7:09 pm
by p8ntman442
DiggityBiggity wrote:
z.MacK wrote:GW will kick terrorist ass into the stone age. We need a consertaive leader right now. Some liberal in the office would be too much of a big pussy.
A big set is what the US of A needs.
Nazi

Your concerned leader

Diggity"Iraq did nothing to us"Biggity
ohh the BLATANT FUCKING INDIFERENCE. one less tyrant in the world the better, I hang my head because of our lack of intervention in the holocaust, and places like RWANDA. But you want us to wait and kill those that make only OUR lives worse. News Flash, the world belongs to all of us, and we should be in support of any war which removes tyrants from power.

Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 7:20 pm
by DiggityBiggity
p8ntman442 wrote:
DiggityBiggity wrote:
z.MacK wrote:GW will kick terrorist ass into the stone age. We need a consertaive leader right now. Some liberal in the office would be too much of a big pussy.
A big set is what the US of A needs.
Nazi

Your concerned leader

Diggity"Iraq did nothing to us"Biggity
ohh the BLATANT FUCKING INDIFERENCE. one less tyrant in the world the better, I hang my head because of our lack of intervention in the holocaust, and places like RWANDA. But you want us to wait and kill those that make only OUR lives worse. News Flash, the world belongs to all of us, and we should be in support of any war which removes tyrants from power.
The United States is causing havoc in Iraq... I'm not against preventing genocide.. but Saddam hadn't committed it recently... and when he did... THE US! sold him the fucking weapons

Your concerned leader

Diggity"This president is a moron"Biggity

Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 7:30 pm
by p8ntman442
not recently...... thats a fucking great justification
we sold him the weapons............which we posess as well and you dont see us committing genocide.


THIS IS GENOCIDE WE ARE TALKING ABOUT. who what where when why and how dont fucking matter, it cant be permitted, and if my country is doing something about it I will back them.

Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 7:34 pm
by DiggityBiggity
p8ntman442 wrote:not recently...... thats a fucking great justification
we sold him the weapons............which we posess as well and you dont see us committing genocide.


THIS IS GENOCIDE WE ARE TALKING ABOUT. who what where when why and how dont fucking matter, it cant be permitted, and if my country is doing something about it I will back them.
It wasn't the reason the American people were told, OR the congress... WE WERE ALL LED TO BELIEVE HE WAS AN IMMEDIATE THREAT!

Your concerned leader

Diggity"We were lied to, stop justifying this unjust war"Biggity