Page 1 of 2

Boost Creep. Enlighten me

Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2005 9:00 am
by AkursedX
I read a lot of turbo-car-related forums (rx-7, mr-2, and for my VW) and I have heard of the term "Boost creep"

Now I think I kind of have an idea of what this is, and why it's a bad thing, but I know there are a few people around here who eat sleep and breathe turbos and I figured I could stoke your ego a bit by asking you guys to explain it to me.

Also, is boost creep only common in small displacement motors. I hear the most about it on rx-7 forums. Would an improperly tuned (Like most of the Turbo Fieros on Fagland) turbo Fiero have to be concerned with boost creep?

Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2005 1:47 pm
by Standard
Boost creep usually means that your wastegate is too small. It's not bypassing enough exhaust so the boost 'creeps' higher as the rpm's rise. It's pretty common on the DSM's, also.

Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2005 6:19 pm
by eHoward
Poor manifold design is also a big contributor.
Standard wrote:Boost creep usually means that your wastegate is too small.

Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2005 10:27 pm
by donk_316
Is that intake manifold or exhaust manifold?

My first thought was exhaust manifold wastegate piping design or lack there of.

Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2005 10:49 pm
by Shaun41178(2)
Wastegate is on tEh eXh!! GOSH!!!!!!!!!!!!!

But yea its usually because of a excessively small wastegate.

First two posts were right.

Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2005 12:09 am
by Standard
eHoward wrote:Poor manifold design is also a big contributor.
Do you mean poor wastegate placement, or are there other factors?

Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2005 12:35 am
by donk_316
Standard wrote:
eHoward wrote:Poor manifold design is also a big contributor.
Do you mean poor wastegate placement, or are there other factors?
Thats what i was trying to say...i KNOW the wastegate goes on the exh side.

Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2005 4:44 am
by trigger
it can also be due to poor tuning. you can actually have unburnt fuel burning off in the exhaust manifold and therefore still spooling the turbo.

Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2005 11:24 am
by eHoward
It is poor placement of the wastegate on the manifold.

I will get my crayons out or maybe just repost some pictures from FieroXs website later today.

Standard wrote:
eHoward wrote:Poor manifold design is also a big contributor.
Do you mean poor wastegate placement, or are there other factors?

Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2005 8:25 pm
by AkursedX
Ok, so if you are flowing more air (Intake, bigger exhaust, headwork) without turning up boost, are you more susceptable to boost creep? My guess is yes.

Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2005 10:35 pm
by eHoward
Ok:
Image

Not so OK:
Image

Ideal:
Image

Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:42 pm
by Doug Chase
eHoward wrote:Ok:
Image

Not so OK:
Image
Why? It doesn't look to me that the flow to the wastegate would be significantly different between these two.

I agree that your "ideal" would be better for wastegate flow. On the other hand, having a big hole on the outside of a bend is bound to disrupt flow to the turbo. What I don't know is how much difference that would make.

Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2005 10:00 pm
by eHoward
First, it is flowing opposite the direction of the exhaust in the manifold.

second, it really should be in the middle of the 3 tubes instead of off to one side. Rational or not, in my mind it makes more difference in the 6 cyl version then the 4. Those outside two tubes arent going to get wastegated at all on the 6.. . Having different manifold pressures in each cylinder caused by the uneven wastegating is not going to be good at all for tuning.


about ideal, it is ideal for wastegate location and routing. I do imagine that air will stack up and become like a wall in the tube that leads to the wastegate until it opens. SO it should behave like a smooth bend until that time. My daydreams are anything but a CFD program though.

I havent had much luck finding a *bad* . .. . i am sure i will though.

Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2005 3:05 am
by trigger
hey howard, you wouldn't happen to know anybody that has a valve seat for a tial 35mm wastegate laying around would you?

Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 11:26 am
by donk_316
I thought about this a while back, I was thinking of adding a second Deltagate to my setup so I wont have this problem.

Like one for each bank of the V6 (35mm each) would totally eliminate the issue plus look pretty trick.

Obviously its overkill but for the price it would be fuck all to add.

Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 11:54 am
by eHoward
nope.
trigger wrote:hey howard, you wouldn't happen to know anybody that has a valve seat for a tial 35mm wastegate laying around would you?

Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 11:58 am
by eHoward
ON a car that is tuned to teh raged edge, I dont think dual wastegates would be a bad idea.
donk_316 wrote:I thought about this a while back, I was thinking of adding a second Deltagate to my setup so I wont have this problem.

Like one for each bank of the V6 (35mm each) would totally eliminate the issue plus look pretty trick.

Obviously its overkill but for the price it would be fuck all to add.
A variation of the above rams horn manifold using dual wastegates:

Image


Yeah I understand that youre talking about a V6 (and probably placing each wastegate on a log manifold) and not an inline 4 set up as I posted but I still think 2 on the merge collector is the way to go on both configurations.

Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 12:05 pm
by donk_316
Man O man those manifolds are sure sweet, beats the hell out of cast iron logs with a crossover

Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 5:38 pm
by Indy
Image

Somewhat O/T, but what is this header made out of that it has the gold hue to it? I was thinking Inconel, but I'm not the brightest.

Awww hell, I'll just start a different topic with my other Q's.

Nate

Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 6:12 pm
by donk_316
I would say its Titanium, cause it looks like my bikes exhaust.