2005 3.6VVT from Buick Lacrose

Sell your parts/cars here. Parts & Cars - not just for "partscars."

Moderator: crzyone

XzotikGT
Posts: 94
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 11:23 pm
Location: Kent, WA

Post by XzotikGT »

last time...make me a offer. Its not going to get done in my car.
XzotikGT
1987 GT+1996 3.4 dohc+To4b+water injection
User avatar
Series8217
1988 Fiero Track Car
Posts: 5984
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 9:47 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Post by Series8217 »

The Dark Side of Will wrote:
Aaron wrote:Not as much as an all iron LSX block. I'm not saying it's light for what it is, I'm saying it's light compared to his 5.3--and it is.
If you're saying that, then find the numbers. Otherwise you're just speculating.

The 3.6 also has an aluminum intake manifold (no idea why...) vs. the nylon manifold on the Gen III/IV engines.

GM still can't take a V6 seriously.
Dude it weighs 360 pounds installed in the FWD auto applications. It's like 200 lbs lighter than the damn LS4.
Atilla the Fun
Posts: 2446
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:36 pm

Post by Atilla the Fun »

I'm not gonna argue that. I will argue that my not using the cam phasing and the displacement on demand features does give me a small reduction of weight. As compared to if I got them and used them. Also, short-term, my using the flyweight Muncie saves me a few pounds versus a 4T65E, like the 3.6 uses.
I'd make an offer, to stick that 3.6 in the Bonneville I didn't have, the last time this thread was active, but you didn't offer this engine before I got my first 5.3
The Dark Side of Will
Peer Mediator
Posts: 15624
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 11:13 pm
Location: In the darkness, where fear and knowing are one
Contact:

Post by The Dark Side of Will »

Series8217 wrote:
The Dark Side of Will wrote:
Aaron wrote:Not as much as an all iron LSX block. I'm not saying it's light for what it is, I'm saying it's light compared to his 5.3--and it is.
If you're saying that, then find the numbers. Otherwise you're just speculating.

The 3.6 also has an aluminum intake manifold (no idea why...) vs. the nylon manifold on the Gen III/IV engines.

GM still can't take a V6 seriously.
Dude it weighs 360 pounds installed in the FWD auto applications. It's like 200 lbs lighter than the damn LS4.
Source?
Doesn't mean it can't shed another 20-30# of intake manifold weight... :thumbleft:
Atilla the Fun
Posts: 2446
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:36 pm

Post by Atilla the Fun »

ArtGTP on Old Europe is looking for a 3.6, so I PM'ed him (or her) about this.
User avatar
Aaron
I just wanna ride my motorcycle
Posts: 5957
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 5:15 am
Contact:

Post by Aaron »

Plus the intake ports on the head are pretty close together, much closer than the 3.4 DOHC. I think my ITBs might fit quite nicely at some point in the future.
User avatar
Series8217
1988 Fiero Track Car
Posts: 5984
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 9:47 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Post by Series8217 »

I was wrong about the 200 lb difference; the weight I had before (from WCF) was the whole powertrain, engine and tranny together.

http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en/pr ... _LY7_n.xls

Engine Mass (kg/lbs) engine plant as shipped weight:
165 / 364 Automatic 187 / 412 Manual

The difference in mass between auto and manual is because of the heavy dual-mass flywheel, and I think it's also shipped with the clutch and pressure plate installed. I don't think the auto comes with the torque converter attached at all.
I just looked up the listing on the engine mass for the LS4 on the same site and it says 419 lbs (automatic).
So the 3.6 weighs 55lbs less than the LS4.
User avatar
Series8217
1988 Fiero Track Car
Posts: 5984
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 9:47 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Post by Series8217 »

Image

Image
User avatar
Series8217
1988 Fiero Track Car
Posts: 5984
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 9:47 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Post by Series8217 »

The Dark Side of Will wrote:The 3.6 is DOHC. That adds a lot of weight.
The 3.6 is a V6. That reduces the components by 25%. Two less pistons, two less connecting rods, a shorter, lighter crankshaft, a lighter harmonic balancer, two less cylinders, a shorter block, only eight more valves and lifters than an OHV V8, lighter lifters since its DOHC, no pushrods, lighter rockers (of course some DOHC designs don't even have rockers),
If the 3.6 was a DOHC V8 version of the LS4 your argument might hold up :-P
XzotikGT
Posts: 94
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 11:23 pm
Location: Kent, WA

Post by XzotikGT »

Series8217 wrote:Image

Image
its like you are trying to make me keep it!=)


anyhow since I am a machinist and have full access to waterjets galore, I was going to make an adapter plate for this motor to be mounted to a standard 60v6 tranny......I was leaning towards the g6 6 speed, but if I really wanted to I could mount it any fiero transaxle.......but then there was always longitudinal. I actually started mocking the car up at one point in time with a audi transaxle.....
XzotikGT
1987 GT+1996 3.4 dohc+To4b+water injection
User avatar
Series8217
1988 Fiero Track Car
Posts: 5984
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 9:47 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Post by Series8217 »

XzotikGT wrote: its like you are trying to make me keep it!=)
I want someone to use it!! Why are you selling? The same reason I'm not buying? (No room or time for another big project...)
Atilla the Fun
Posts: 2446
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:36 pm

Post by Atilla the Fun »

when did the 303-HP 3.6 come with a manual? I thought that wasn't happening until the new Camaro arrives 10 months from now.
The Dark Side of Will
Peer Mediator
Posts: 15624
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 11:13 pm
Location: In the darkness, where fear and knowing are one
Contact:

Post by The Dark Side of Will »

In the '08 CTS.
CincinnatiFiero
Posts: 2908
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 2:47 pm
Location: Columbus, Ohio

Post by CincinnatiFiero »

This would be a hell of a swap, too bad I am balls deep in like 4 other projects. If someone figures it out first then a million of us will follow haha.
XzotikGT
Posts: 94
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 11:23 pm
Location: Kent, WA

Post by XzotikGT »

its been figured out. I just dont have the time to do it anymore, and I have all these damn parts just sitting around.
XzotikGT
1987 GT+1996 3.4 dohc+To4b+water injection
User avatar
Series8217
1988 Fiero Track Car
Posts: 5984
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 9:47 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Post by Series8217 »

Well, don't throw it away. Someone will buy it I'm sure.
XzotikGT
Posts: 94
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 11:23 pm
Location: Kent, WA

Post by XzotikGT »

550.oo plus shipping.....need this stuff gone like yesterday!
XzotikGT
1987 GT+1996 3.4 dohc+To4b+water injection
Nashco
Posts: 408
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 12:58 pm
Location: Portland, OR
Contact:

Post by Nashco »

XzotikGT wrote:550.oo plus shipping.....need this stuff gone like yesterday!
How much of this is left in the $550 deal? Thanks.
XzotikGT wrote:This is as complete as it gets. I have the complete uncut harness, all accessories, fuse box, fuel pump, exhaust all the way to the joint just after the cat, drive by wire gas pedal, two PCMs: one for the tranny and one for the motor, Mass airflow sensor. This motor will bolt right to the six speed in the SAAb 9-3(six speed), and will work out quite nice in a Fiero.
Bryce
XzotikGT
Posts: 94
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 11:23 pm
Location: Kent, WA

Post by XzotikGT »

everything
XzotikGT
1987 GT+1996 3.4 dohc+To4b+water injection
User avatar
Series8217
1988 Fiero Track Car
Posts: 5984
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 9:47 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Post by Series8217 »

I got a new job. If I'm still there after 4 months, and your motor is still there after 4 months, I'll probably buy this.
Post Reply