[quote="DiggityBiggity"]
>>>>>>>>I'm sorry EB, but you cannot lump me into a group of DROID LIKE REPUBLICANS.
For a guy that spent hours constructing a site with data and info to short stroke this argument w/o any data………uh, yea I can.
>>>>>>>>Do you understand what Clinton did to this country when it comes to NAFTA, GATT, and WTO?
Yep, NAFTA sucked, it was GHW Bush’s baby and he went along with it; that pissed me off. We’ve had Maqilladeros at the Mexican-American border for 40 years, so the work leaving was meaningless, it was a tax break for corps. Hell, my old 83 Chevy truck was made in Canada so I don’t wanna hear this is a new trend.
I don’t know tons about GATT or WTO, just the riots in Seattle for the latter.
>>>>>>>>>Do you understand why all of our jobs are LEAVING this country?
Because the US is primarily fascist. Corporations are writing laws to allow this and all politicians are going for it.
>>>>>>>>Do you understand the NET BUBBLE was the only reason people were happy with Clinton, something that just so happened to happen under his presidency.
He was the inheritor of great timing, however he did the right things with great fortune. If GW Dipshit were in charge he would find a way to give it all to corps. Conversely, if Clinton were in charge 2001 to now he would have done positive things with 911 and Katrina. So if the Clinton Bubble to what, 12000 was just a shirt-term bubblem then what do we have now at 13k+? Kinda shits on your argument.
People were happy because we moved ahead of foreign markets as far as money, our debt was leveled off, the world started liking us again and a myriad of reasons. Perhaps, Mr. dot.com bubble, you can explain that during the Clinton so-called bubble our dollar soared, but now with the market measurably higher the dollar is dying? Wait, wait, be the Ron Paulian drone and give me more rhetoric.
>>>>>>>>>Do you realize that EVERY OTHER MAINSTREAM CANDIDATE on stage is a member of the CFR and some even members of the TRI LATERAL COMMISSION.
OK, so they are part of the Council on Foreign Relations (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_on ... _Relations) with their published agenda:
From its inception the Council was non-partisan, welcoming members of both Democratic and Republican parties. It also welcomed Jews and African-Americans, with only women initially barred from membership. Its proceedings were almost universally private and confidential.[22] It has exerted influence on US foreign policy from the beginning, due to its roster of State Department and other government officials as members; as such, it has been the focus of many conspiracy theories (Perloff 37, et passim). A study by two critics of the organization, Laurence Shoup and William Minter, found that of 502 government officials surveyed from 1945 to 1972, more than half were members of the Council.[23][24]
So what now Brian, should we be isolationists? More conspiracy talk? Everything doesn’t have to be a conspiracy, Brian.
>>>>>>>>Do you understand that BOTH of those organizations have VOWED to literally destroy the sovereignty of our country through the creation of a NAU (North American Union) and it's already being worked on BEHIND THE SENATE AND HOUSES BACK in the SPP (security and prosperity partnership)
Of course that will happen regardless of who is president or whatever happens.
>>>>>>>>Ron Paul is not some Neo-Con, he a REAL republican, someone who belies in the fundamental understanding of LIBERTY!!
Well at least you agree that Republicans and Libertarians are virtually the same thing. So a real Republican wants zero to do with ensuring the health of a country? NICEEEEEE. You have yet to lay out a real platform other that, “It will just work; you’ll see.â€